Orthodontic cements induce genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in mammalian cells in vitro
- PMID: 23162578
- PMCID: PMC3491324
Orthodontic cements induce genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in mammalian cells in vitro
Abstract
Background: This study assessed the genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of three different glass ionomer cements used in Orthodontics (Vidrion C, OptiBand, and Band-Lok).
Materials and methods: The tested cements were exposed in vitro to mouse fibroblast cells for 1 h at 37°C. The genotoxicity and cytotoxicity were evaluated by means of the single cell gel (Comet Assay) and the trypan blue exclusion test, respectively. All data were assessed by the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test, followed by Dunn's test. P < 0.05 was considered for statistical significance.
Results: Significant statistically differences (P < 0.05) in cytotoxicity were observed for both Vidrion C powder and liquid at the tested concentrations, with exception to the group presenting the lowest powder concentration. OptiBand similarly presented induced cellular death at the highest tested concentration for paste A (P < 0.05). Band-Lok paste B was also able to induce cytotoxicity at the highest tested concentration. Regarding the comet assay, Band-Lok paste B and OptiBand paste A resulted in increased DNA injury (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: The obtained results support the thought that some glass ionomer cement components present both genotoxic and cytotoxic effects when in high concentrations. Since DNA damage and cellular death are important events during oncogenesis, this study represents relevant contribution to estimate the real risks induced by these materials upon cellular systems.
Keywords: Cytotoxicity; genotoxicity; glass ionomer cements; mouse fibroblast cells.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity induced by eluates from orthodontic glass ionomer cements in vitro.Saudi Dent J. 2018 Jan;30(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Saudi Dent J. 2018. PMID: 30166869 Free PMC article.
-
Biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cements using mouse lymphoma cells in vitro.J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Dec;33(12):912-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01658.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2006. PMID: 17168933
-
Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of glass ionomer cements on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Jun;17(6):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-8931-5. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006. PMID: 16691346
-
Orthodontic bonding with glass ionomer cement--a review.Eur J Orthod. 1996 Aug;18(4):385-99. doi: 10.1093/ejo/18.4.385. Eur J Orthod. 1996. PMID: 8921660 Review.
-
The comet assay with multiple mouse organs: comparison of comet assay results and carcinogenicity with 208 chemicals selected from the IARC monographs and U.S. NTP Carcinogenicity Database.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2000 Nov;30(6):629-799. doi: 10.1080/10408440008951123. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2000. PMID: 11145306 Review.
Cited by
-
SEM-EDS-Based Elemental Identification on the Enamel Surface after the Completion of Orthodontic Treatment: In Vitro Studies.Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7280535. doi: 10.1155/2016/7280535. Epub 2016 Sep 27. Biomed Res Int. 2016. PMID: 27766265 Free PMC article.
-
Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity induced by eluates from orthodontic glass ionomer cements in vitro.Saudi Dent J. 2018 Jan;30(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Saudi Dent J. 2018. PMID: 30166869 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Maijer R, Smith DC. A comparison between zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cement in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;93:273–9. - PubMed
-
- Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC, Wistrom DW, Swift EJ., Jr Short-term fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater. 1995;11:96–101. - PubMed
-
- McCabe JF. Resin-modified glass-ionomers. Biomaterials. 1988;19:521–7. - PubMed
-
- Yoshida Y, van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Snauwaert J, Hellemans L, Lambrechts P, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res. 2000;79:709–14. - PubMed
-
- Willians DF. England co. 4. New York: Elsevier; 1986. Definitions in biomaterials. Proceedings of a Consensus Conference of the European Society for Biomaterials.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources