An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials
- PMID: 23162589
- PMCID: PMC3491335
An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials
Abstract
Background: Regarding the importance of sealing ability of restorative dental materials, this study was done to assess the microleakage of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin and compare to different flowable materials.
Materials and methods: Seventy standardized class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of maxillary premolars teeth. The occlusal and the gingival margins of the cavities were located on the enamel and cementum/dentin, respectively. Teeth were randomly assigned into five groups (n = 14) and restored with different flowable materials following the manufacturer's instructions: groups I and II: EMBRACE WetBond flowable composite resin with and without acid etching and bonding agent, respectively; group III: flowable compomer (Dyract Flow); and IV and V: microhybrid (Tetric Flow) and nanofilled (Premise Flowable) flowable composite resins, respectively. After finishing and polishing, the teeth were stored in distilled water at 37°C, thermocycled, coated with nail varnish, and immersed in a basic fuchsin, and then longitudinally sectioned. Dye penetration was examined with a stereomicroscope and scored separately for occlusal and gingival on a 0-3 ordinal scale. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests (α=0.05).
Results: EMBRACE WetBond with acid etching and bonding agent had significantly less microleakage at the occlusal margins than those without, but not at cervical margins. Also cavities restored with EMBRACE WetBond without acid etching and bonding agent showed significantly greater microleakage scores than other groups at occlusal margin, but there was no significant difference at the cervical margin.
Conclusion: The application of acid etching and bonding agent with EMBRACE WetBond provided better occlusal marginal sealing than those without at class V cavities.
Keywords: Class V cavities; flowable compomer; flowable composite resin; microleakage.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.Oper Dent. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):42-6. Oper Dent. 2003. PMID: 12540117 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparative evaluation of marginal microleakage of three different resins in Class V composite restorations].Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2017 Jun;26(3):241-245. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2017. PMID: 29098237 Chinese.
-
The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities.Oper Dent. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):773-8. Oper Dent. 2003. PMID: 14653293 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Microleakage of Class V Cavities restored with the Embrace WetBond Class V Composite Resin and Conventional Opallis Composite Resin.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):867-873. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2141. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017. PMID: 28989122
-
Comparative evaluation of microleakage around Class V cavities restored with alkasite restorative material with and without bonding agent and flowable composite resin: An in vitro study.Indian J Dent Res. 2019 May-Jun;30(3):403-407. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_767_17. Indian J Dent Res. 2019. PMID: 31397416
Cited by
-
Comparison of self-adhering flowable composite microleakage with several types of bonding agent in class V cavity restoration.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Jul-Aug;16(4):257-263. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019. PMID: 31303881 Free PMC article.
-
A New Landscape of Human Dental Aging: Causes, Consequences, and Intervention Avenues.Aging Dis. 2023 Aug 1;14(4):1123-1144. doi: 10.14336/AD.2022.1224. Aging Dis. 2023. PMID: 37163430 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Does the use of a novel self-adhesive flowable composite reduce nanoleakage?Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015 Mar 27;7:55-64. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S80462. eCollection 2015. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015. PMID: 25848318 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Flowable Composite Resin Using Etch and Rinse, Self-Etch Adhesive Systems, and Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities: Confocal Laser Microscopic Study.Materials (Basel). 2022 Jul 16;15(14):4963. doi: 10.3390/ma15144963. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35888429 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Tobias TS, Cohen RE. Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: A re-evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003;134:845–50. - PubMed
-
- Miyasaka T, Okamura H. Dimensional change measurements of conventional and flowable composite resins using a laser displacement sensor. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:544–51. - PubMed
-
- Attar N, Tam LE, McComb D. Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69:516–21. - PubMed
-
- Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2005;21:1150–7. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources