Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;4(5):1017-1022.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.853. Epub 2012 Aug 6.

Nedaplatin and irinotecan combination therapy is equally effective and less toxic than cisplatin and irinotecan for patients with primary clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary and recurrent ovarian carcinoma

Affiliations

Nedaplatin and irinotecan combination therapy is equally effective and less toxic than cisplatin and irinotecan for patients with primary clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary and recurrent ovarian carcinoma

Shizuo Machida et al. Oncol Lett. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

This study retrospectively compared nedaplatin and irinotecan hydrochloride (NDP/CPT) combination therapy with cisplatin and irinotecan hydrochloride therapy (CDDP/CPT) for efficacy and adverse events in the treatment of clear cell adenocarcinoma of the ovary (CCC) and recurrent ovarian carcinoma. A total of 115 patients were included in the present study. NDP/CPT was administered intravenously every 4 weeks (NDP, 60 mg/m(2) on day 1; CPT, 50 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15). CDDP/CPT was also administered intravenously (CDDP, 60 mg/m(2) on day 1; CPT, 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15). Patients with primary CCC were treated with NDP/CPT in 29 cases and CDDP/CPT in 20 cases. Patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma were treated with NDP/CPT and CDDP/CPT in 33 cases each. No significant difference was observed in the 5-year overall survival (OS)/progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with primary CCC, with the exception of those patients with stages Ia and Ic(b) who underwent NDP/CPT and CDDP/CPT treatments (OS: 58%, PFS: 40% and OS: 53% and PFS: 47%, respectively). No significant differences were found in the response rates to NDP/CPT and CDDP/CPT in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma (27 and 18%, respectively). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the 5-year OS and PFS of patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma treated with NDP/CPT or CDDP/CPT (OS: 15%, PFS: 3% and OS: 18%, PFS: 6%, respectively). In terms of the hematological toxicity of grade 3 or above and non-hematological toxicity of grade 2 or above in patients treated with NDP/CPT and CDDP/CPT, respectively, neutropenia was 23 and 56%; anemia, 1, and 20%; thrombocytopenia, 0 and 5%; nausea, 20 and 52%; diarrhea, 14 and 25%; and fever, 2 and 11%. Accordingly, NDP/CPT indicated mild toxicity, and was therefore equally effective and less toxic than CDDP/CPT in the treatment of primary CCC and recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall survival (OS) of patients with primary CCC, excluding those with stages Ia and Ic(b). The 5-year OS is 58% in patients treated with NDP/CPT and 53% in those treated with CDDP/CPT. No significant difference was observed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with primary CCC, excluding those with stages Ia and Ic(b). The 5-year PFS is 40% in patients treated with NDP/CPT and 47% in those treated with CDDP/CPT. No significant difference was observed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall survival (OS) of recurrent ovarian carcinoma. The 5-year OS is 15% in patients treated with NDP/CPT and 18% in patients treated with CDDP/CPT. No significant difference is observed. The median OS in the two groups is 19 months. No significant difference was observed.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Progression-free survival (PFS) of recurrent ovarian carcinoma. The 5-year PFS is 3% in patients treated with NDP/CPT and 6% in patients treated with CDDP/CPT. No significant difference was observed. The median PFS is 6 months in patients treated with NDP/CPT and 4 months in patients treated with CDDP/CPT. No significant difference was observed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Serov SF, Scully RE, Sobin LH, editors. International Histologic Classification of Tumors, No 9 Histological Typing of Ovarian Tumors. World Health Organization; Geneva: 1973.
    1. Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, et al. Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 6th Annual Report on Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95:S161–S192. - PubMed
    1. Sugiyama T, Kamura T, Kigawa J, et al. Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer. 2000;88:2584–2589. - PubMed
    1. Du Bois A, Herrstedt J, Hardy-Bessard AC, et al. Phase III trial of carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without gemcitabine in first-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4162–4169. - PubMed
    1. Utsunomiya H, Akahira J, Tanno S, et al. Paclitaxel-platinum combination chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: a multicenter trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:52–56. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources