Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Dec;76(6):1152-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.021.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis

Xiwei Ding et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is still controversial.

Objective: We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NSAIDs for PEP prophylaxis.

Design: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant studies published updated to June 2012.

Setting: Meta-analysis.

Patients: Patients undergoing ERCP.

Interventions: NSAIDs use for the prevention of PEP.

Main outcome measurements: Overall incidence of PEP, incidence of moderate to severe PEP, and adverse events.

Results: Ten RCTs involving 2269 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that NSAID use decreased the overall incidence of PEP (risk ratio [RR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.38-0.86; P = .007). The absolute risk reduction was 5.9%. The number needed to treat was 17. Heterogeneity among the studies was substantial. However, after removing the main source of heterogeneity, the prophylactic efficacy was similar (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.41-0.68; P < .001). NSAID use also decreased the incidence of moderate to severe PEP (RR 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.75; P = .002). The absolute risk reduction was 3.0%. The number needed to treat was 34. No differences of the adverse events attributable to NSAIDs were observed.

Limitations: Inclusion of low-quality studies, different type and route of administration of the NSAIDs, study heterogeneity, inconsistent use of pancreatic stenting.

Conclusions: Prophylactic use of NSAIDs reduces the incidence and severity of PEP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances