Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation
- PMID: 23165615
- DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamasurg.96
Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation
Abstract
Hypothesis: When assessing the effect of operative approach on outcomes, it may be less relevant whether a transhiatal or an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was performed and may be more important to focus on patient selection and the quality of the hospital performing the operation.
Design: Observational study.
Setting: Hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Patients: Individuals undergoing esophagectomy were identified from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2010. The following 4 groups were created based on operative approach: transhiatal, Ivor Lewis, 3-field, and any approach with an intestinal conduit.
Main outcome measures: Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes and hospital-level variation in performance.
Results: At 164 hospitals, 1738 patients underwent an esophageal resection: 710 (40.9%) were transhiatal, 497 (28.6%) were Ivor Lewis, 361 (20.8%) were 3-field, and 170 (9.8%) were intestinal conduits. Compared with the transhiatal approach, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy was not associated with increased risk for postoperative complications; however, 3-field esophagectomy was associated with increased likelihood of postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.28-2.77) and prolonged ventilation exceeding 48 hours (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.16-2.42). Intestinal conduit use was associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.08-6.47), prolonged ventilation exceeding 48 hours (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.01-2.54), and return to the operating room for any indication (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.16-2.96). Patient characteristics were the strongest predictive factors for 30-day mortality and serious morbidity. After case-mix adjustment, hospital performance varied by 161% for 30-day mortality and by 84% for serious morbidity.
Conclusions: Compared with transhiatal dissection, Ivor Lewis esophagectomy did not result in worse postoperative complications. After controlling for case-mix, hospital performance varied widely for all outcomes assessed, indicating that reductions in short-term outcomes will likely result from expanding other aspects of hospital quality beyond a focus on specific technical maneuvers.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Sep;42(3):430-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs031. Epub 2012 Feb 15. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22345284
-
The impact of operative approach for oesophageal cancer on outcome: the transhiatal approach may influence circumferential margin involvement.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;38(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.11.008. Epub 2011 Dec 9. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22154884
-
Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 2005-2011 NSQIP comparison of modern multicenter results.J Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;110(3):298-301. doi: 10.1002/jso.23637. Epub 2014 May 29. J Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24891305
-
Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Am J Surg. 2005 Jul;190(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.12.004. Am J Surg. 2005. PMID: 15972176 Review.
-
Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for distal esophageal cancer: which is superior?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Feb;12(2):265-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.252148. Epub 2010 Nov 3. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21051381 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgical Timing and Outcomes in Esophageal Cancer: Insights from One- and Two-Stage Esophagectomies in a Polish Cohort.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):4301. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124301. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40566043 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Apgar Score Predicted Postoperative Morbidity After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.World J Surg. 2016 May;40(5):1145-51. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3425-1. World J Surg. 2016. PMID: 26801506
-
Impact of preoperative fecal short chain fatty acids on postoperative infectious complications in esophageal cancer patients.BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar 16;20(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01217-y. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 32178628 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and risk factors for transfusion in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):719-28. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2417-9. Epub 2013 Dec 10. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014. PMID: 24323432
-
Extended lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is debatable.World J Surg. 2013 Aug;37(8):1757-67. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2018-5. World J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23553174
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical