Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;33(3):571-81.
doi: 10.1128/MCB.01265-12. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

Oligodeoxynucleotide binding to (CTG) · (CAG) microsatellite repeats inhibits replication fork stalling, hairpin formation, and genome instability

Affiliations

Oligodeoxynucleotide binding to (CTG) · (CAG) microsatellite repeats inhibits replication fork stalling, hairpin formation, and genome instability

Guoqi Liu et al. Mol Cell Biol. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

(CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) trinucleotide repeat (TNR) expansion in the 3' untranslated region of the dystrophia myotonica protein kinase (DMPK) gene causes myotonic dystrophy type 1. However, a direct link between TNR instability, the formation of noncanonical (CTG)(n) · (CAG)(n) structures, and replication stress has not been demonstrated. In a human cell model, we found that (CTG)(45) · (CAG)(45) causes local replication fork stalling, DNA hairpin formation, and TNR instability. Oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) complementary to the (CTG)(45) · (CAG)(45) lagging-strand template eliminated DNA hairpin formation on leading- and lagging-strand templates and relieved fork stalling. Prolonged cell culture, emetine inhibition of lagging-strand synthesis, or slowing of DNA synthesis by low-dose aphidicolin induced (CTG)(45) · (CAG)(45) expansions and contractions. ODNs targeting the lagging-strand template blocked the time-dependent or emetine-induced instability but did not eliminate aphidicolin-induced instability. These results show directly that TNR replication stalling, replication stress, hairpin formation, and instability are mechanistically linked in vivo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
ODNs release replication fork stalling. (a) Diagram of ectopic c-myc–TNR locus in (CTG)45 and (CAG)45 cell lines. Horizontal line, chromosomal DNA; oval, the bidirectional c-myc replicator; dashed arrows, bidirectional replication forks; vertical rectangle, (CTG)45 repeat (above chromosomal DNA) or (CAG)45 repeat tract (below chromosome) [in the (CTG)45 cell line, (CTG)45 is in the lagging-strand template; in the (CAG)45 cell line, (CAG)45 is on the lagging-strand template]; short horizontal bars above the chromosomal DNA, locations of STS-pVD1 and STS-pVD2. P1 and P2 primers for small-pool PCR are indicated by two head-on arrows. (b) HeLa derivative cell lines HeLa/c-myc, HeLa/c-myc–(CTG)45, and HeLa/c-myc–(CAG)45 were transfected with the indicated ODNs every 48 h for three times, and nascent DNA was isolated as described previously (31, 57). Size-fractioned nascent DNA was isolated and quantitated using Sybr green real-time PCR (Life Technologies). For different nascent DNA preparations, STS-54.8 at the β-globin origin (31) was used as the internal normalizer. To compare the nascent DNA abundance at STS-pVD1 and STS-pVD2, data from WT were set equal to 100%, and the nascent DNA abundances of (CTG)45 and (CAG)45 cells with different treatments at the same STS were accordingly calculated. The data presented are the means (±standard deviations) of triplicate analyses on at least three independent preparations of nascent DNA from each cell line with proper treatments. Error bars, standard deviations.
Fig 2
Fig 2
ODNs inhibit hairpin formation on lagging-strand templates. Cells were cotransfected with ZFN (or ZFP) expression plasmids and either a random 21-mer ODN (mock-treated ODN) or ODNs every 48 h for three times before genomic DNA was isolated. spPCR products of genomic DNA were amplified by primers P1 and P2 (Fig. 1a) and resolved by 8% PAGE. A 100-bp DNA ladder was used as the DNA size marker. (a) Inhibition of hairpin formation by (CAG)7 in (CTG)45 cells. Lanes 1 to 4, mock ODN treatment of cells expressing ZFPCTG; lanes 5 to 8, mock ODN treatment of cells expressing ZFNCTG; lanes 9 to 12, (CTG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFPCTG; lanes 13 to 16, (CAG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFNCTG. The ∼270-bp PCR product [(CTG)45 · (CAG)45 progenitor allele] is indicated with an arrow. The lower-mobility shadow bands observed above the ∼270-bp amplification product of the (CTG)45 · (CAG)45 progenitor sequence are slipped-strand structures formed in vitro during PCR reannealing (6), as demonstrated by reamplification of the linear ∼270-bp product band (8). Bands migrating faster than the progenitor product are the results of in vivo nuclease cleavage. (b) Predicted hairpin inhibition by the (CAG)7 ODNs. (c) Inhibition of hairpin formation by (CTG)7 in (CAG)45 cells. Lanes 1 to 4, mock ODN treatment of cells expressing ZFPCAG; lanes 5 to 8, mock ODN treatment of cells expressing ZFNCAG; lanes 9 to 12, (CTG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFPCAG; lanes 13 to 16, (CTG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFNCAG. (d) Predicted hairpin inhibition by (CTG)7 in (CAG)45 cells. In panels b and d, (CTG)n, ZFNCTG, (CAG)n, and ZFNCAG are depicted in gray. ODNs are depicted as multiple short bars, and ZFNs are depicted as sickles.
Fig 3
Fig 3
ODNs do not inhibit hairpin formation on the leading-strand template. (a) Inability of (CTG)7 to inhibit hairpin formation in (CTG)45 cells. Lanes 1 to 4, mock ODN treatment of cells expressing ZFPCAG; lanes 5 to 8, mock ODN treatment of cells expressing ZFNCAG; lanes 9 to 13, (CTG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFPCAG; lanes 14 to 18, (CTG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFNCAG. spPCR products of genomic DNA were amplified by primers P1 and P2 (Fig. 1a) and resolved by PAGE. (b) Predicted hairpin inhibition by (CTG)7. (c) Absence of inhibition of hairpin formation by (CAG)7 in (CAG)45 cells. Lanes 1 to 4, control ODN treatment of cells expressing ZFPCTG; lanes 5 to 8, control ODN treatment of cells expressing ZFNCTG; lanes 9 to 12, (CAG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFPCTG; lanes 13 to 16, (CAG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFNCTG. (d) Predicted hairpin inhibition by (CAG)7 in (CAG)45 cells.
Fig 4
Fig 4
ODN-mediated inhibition of lagging-strand template hairpins suppresses hairpin formation on leading-strand templates. (a) Simultaneous inhibition of hairpin formation on both lagging- and leading-strand templates by (CAG)7 in (CTG)45 cells. Lanes 1 to 4, (CAG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFPCAG; lanes 5 to 8, (CAG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFNCAG; lanes 9 to 12, (CTG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFPCTG; lanes 13 to 16, (CTG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFNCTG. spPCR products of genomic DNA were amplified by primers P1 and P2 (Fig. 1a) and resolved by PAGE. (b) Predicted hairpin inhibition by (CAG)7 and (CTG)7. (c) Simultaneous inhibition of hairpin formation on both lagging- and leading-strand templates by (CTG)7 in (CAG)45 cells. Lanes 1 to 4, (CTG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFPCTG; lanes 5 to 8, (CTG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFNCTG; lanes 9 to 12, (CAG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFPCAG; lanes 13 to 16, (CAG)7 treatment of cells expressing ZFNCAG. (d) Predicted hairpin inhibition by (CTG)7 in (CAG)45 cells.
Fig 5
Fig 5
ODNs stabilize (CTG)45 · (CAG)45 TNRs against emetine-induced instability. (CTG)45 or (CAG)45 cells were treated with emetine (EME) (a) or aphidicolin (APH) (b) and transfected with the indicated ODNs or not transfected (see Materials and Methods). spPCR products of genomic DNA were amplified by primers P1 and P2 (Fig. 1a) and resolved by PAGE. Arrows, progenitor PCR products; exp., expansion; contr., contraction; lanes M, molecular size markers.
Fig 6
Fig 6
ODNs inhibit (CTG)45 · (CAG)45 TNR instability during unperturbed cell culture. (CTG)45 · (CAG)45 cells were grown for ∼25 or ∼250 PDs in the absence or presence of the indicated lagging-strand-targeting ODNs. spPCR products of genomic DNA were amplified by primers P1 and P2 (Fig. 1a) and resolved by PAGE. Arrows, progenitor PCR products; exp., expansion; contr., contraction; lanes M, molecular size markers.
Fig 7
Fig 7
Model of coordinated hairpin formation. (a) Lagging-strand hairpin formation during unperturbed cell division causes polymerase (circle) stalling or fork reversal. (b) ODNs prevent lagging-strand hairpin formation by annealing to the lagging-strand template (23, 25) or reversing hairpin formation by annealing to the hairpin (21, 33). (c) Slowing of leading- and lagging-strand polymerases leads to fork reversal which cannot be reversed by ODNs binding to the lagging-strand template. (d) In the absence of ODNs, fork reversal leads to hairpin formation on leading- and lagging-strand templates (generating contractions) and leading- and lagging-strand nascent DNA (generating expansions). Gray lines, TNR sequences; black lines, flanking DNA. For brevity, template and nascent-strand hairpins are shown at the same fork (c and d), although these structures need not occur in the same cell.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McMurray CT. 2010. Mechanisms of trinucleotide repeat instability during human development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 786–799 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mirkin SM. 2007. Expandable DNA repeats and human disease. Nature 447: 932–940 - PubMed
    1. Pearson CE, Edamura KN, Cleary JD. 2005. Repeat instability: mechanisms of dynamic mutations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6: 729–742 - PubMed
    1. Figueroa AA, Cattie D, Delaney S. 2011. Structure of even/odd trinucleotide repeat sequences modulates persistence of non-B conformations and conversion to duplex. Biochemistry 50: 4441–4450 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartenstine MJ, Goodman MF, Petruska J. 2002. Weak strand displacement activity enables human DNA polymerase beta to expand CAG/CTG triplet repeats at strand breaks. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 41379–41389 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources