Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;27(11):1339-46.
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2012.27.11.1339. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

Safety and efficacy of overlapping homogenous drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

Collaborators, Affiliations

Safety and efficacy of overlapping homogenous drug-eluting stents in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

Khurshid Ahmed et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of 4 homogenous overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. We selected 1,349 consecutive patients (62.1 ± 14.9 yr, 69.4% male) who received homogenous overlapping DESs in diffuse de novo coronary lesions from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry from April 2006 through September 2010. They were divided into 4 groups based on type of DES implanted - Paclitaxel (PES), Sirolimus (SES), Zotarolimus (ZES) and Everolimus (EES)-eluting stents. Primary endpoint was 12-month MACE. We also studied EES versus other DESs (PES + SES + ZES). Mean stent length was 26.2 ± 7.5 mm and mean stent diameter was 3.1 ± 0.4 mm. Average number of stents used per vessel was 2.2 ± 0.5. Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in PES, SES, ZES, and EES groups were 9.5%, 9.2%, 7.5%, and 3.8%, respectively (P = 0.013). In EES group, overall MACE and repeat revascularization were lowest, and no incidence of stent thrombosis was observed. Non-fatal MI was highest in PES, almost similar in SES and EES with no incidence in ZES group (P = 0.044). Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed no differences in the incidence of primary endpoint (P = 0.409). This study shows no significant differences in 12-month MACE among 4 groups.

Keywords: Coronary Angioplasty; Drug-Eluting Stents; Myocardial Infarction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cox model survival curves for 12-month major adverse cardiac events-free survival among 4 overlapping homogenous drug-eluting stents. DES, drug-eluting stent; PES, Paclitaxel-eluting stent; SES, Sirolimus-eluting stent; ZES, Zotarolimus-eluting stent; EES, Everolimus-eluting stent.

Similar articles

References

    1. Stettler C, Wandel S, Allemann S, Kastrati A, Morice MC, Schömig A, Pfisterer ME, Stone GW, Leon MB, de Lezo JS, et al. Outcomes associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: a collaborative network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;370:937–948. - PubMed
    1. Kaltoft A, Jensen LO, Maeng M, Tilsted HH, Thayssen P, Bøttcher M, Lassen JF, Krusell LR, Rasmussen K, Hansen KN, et al. 2-year clinical outcomes after implantation of sirolimus-eluting, paclitaxel-eluting, and bare-metal coronary stents: results from the WDHR (Western Denmark Heart Registry) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:658–664. - PubMed
    1. James SK, Stenestrand U, Lindback J, Carlsson J, Scherstén F, Nilsson T, Wallentin L, Lagerqvist B SCAAR Study Group. Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in Sweden. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1933–1945. - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg MJ, Konnyu KJ. Review of randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents for the prevention of in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:375–382. - PubMed
    1. Roukoz H, Bavry AA, Sarkees ML, Mood GR, Kumbhani DJ, Rabbat MG, Bhatt DL. Comprehensive meta-analysis on drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents during extended follow-up. Am J Med. 2009;122:581.e1–581.e10. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms