Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(11):e49472.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049472. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

Impaired olfactory associative behavior of honeybee workers due to contamination of imidacloprid in the larval stage

Affiliations

Impaired olfactory associative behavior of honeybee workers due to contamination of imidacloprid in the larval stage

En-Cheng Yang et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

The residue of imidacloprid in the nectar and pollens of the plants is toxic not only to adult honeybees but also the larvae. Our understanding of the risk of imidacloprid to larvae of the honeybees is still in a very early stage. In this study, the capped-brood, pupation and eclosion rates of the honeybee larvae were recorded after treating them directly in the hive with different dosages of imidacloprid. The brood-capped rates of the larvae decreased significantly when the dosages increased from 24 to 8000 ng/larva. However, there were no significant effects of DMSO or 0.4 ng of imidacloprid per larva on the brood-capped, pupation and eclosion rates. Although the sublethal dosage of imidacloprid had no effect on the eclosion rate, we found that the olfactory associative behavior of the adult bees was impaired if they had been treated with 0.04 ng/larva imidacloprid in the larval stage. These results demonstrate that a sublethal dosage of imidacloprid given to the larvae affects the subsequent associative ability of the adult honeybee workers. Thus, a low dose of imidacloprid may affect the survival condition of the entire colony, even though the larvae survive to adulthood.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Lethal effect of imidacloprid on the honeybee larvae.
The subfigures show the effects of imidacloprid on the capped-brood rate (A), pupation rate (B) and the eclosion rate (C) of honeybee larvae under field conditions (Tested larvae were obtained from 4 colonies, N 0.1% DMSO = 40+40+35+40, N 1% DMSO = 30+40+40+30, N 0.4 ng = 40+40+35+40, N 24 ng = 30+30+40+30, N 200 ng = 30+40+40+30, N 2000 ng = 40+40+30+30, N 4000 ng = 40+40+30+30, N 6000 ng = 40+40+30+30, N 8000 ng = 30+40+30+30 larvae). The doses of imidacloprid treatments are 0.4, 24, 200, 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 ng/larva. C1 and C2 are the control groups (0.1 and 1% DMSO). In each subfigure, any two effects of the experimental treatments without any same letter above the columns are significantly different (two-tailed Kruskal-Wallis H test, P<0.001, compared by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U tests with Dunn-Šidák correction at the 95% confidence level).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Impaired olfactory associative behavior in adulthood caused by the larval contamination of imidacloprid.
The subfigures show the effect of DMSO (A) and imidacloprid (B) on the olfactory associative behavior of the honeybee (Tested honeybees were obtained from 3 colonies, N 1% DMSO = 35+25+30, N Control = 33+30+30, N DDW = 30+30+28, N 0.0004 ng = 30+30+30, N 0.004 ng = 32+30+30, N 0.04 ng = 30+30+35, N 0.4 ng = 26+29+32 bees). T1, T2, T3 and T4 are conditioning trials 1–4, respectively. In figure 2B, any two effects of the experimental treatments among T2, T3 or T4 without any same letter beside the data points are significantly different (two-tailed Kruskal-Wallis H test, P≤0.001, compared by two-tailed Mann-Whitney U tests with Dunn-Šidák correction at the 95% confidence level).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Free JB (1993) Insect pollination of crops. San Diego: Academic Press. 544 p.
    1. Kevan PG (1999) Pollinators as bioindicators of the state of the environment: species, activity and diversity. Agricult Ecosys Environ 74: 373–393.
    1. Porrini C, Sabatini AG, Girotti S, Fini F, Monaco L, et al. (2003) The death of honey bees and environmental pollution by pesticides: the honey bees as biological indicators. Bull Insectol 56: 147–152.
    1. Stokstad E (2007) The case of the empty hives. Science 316: 970–972. - PubMed
    1. Schmuck R (1999) No causal relationship between Gaucho® seed dressing in sunflowers and the French bee syndrome. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr Bayer 52: 257–299.

Publication types

MeSH terms