Mapping bacterial functional networks and pathways in Escherichia Coli using synthetic genetic arrays
- PMID: 23168417
- PMCID: PMC3520574
- DOI: 10.3791/4056
Mapping bacterial functional networks and pathways in Escherichia Coli using synthetic genetic arrays
Abstract
Phenotypes are determined by a complex series of physical (e.g. protein-protein) and functional (e.g. gene-gene or genetic) interactions (GI)(1). While physical interactions can indicate which bacterial proteins are associated as complexes, they do not necessarily reveal pathway-level functional relationships1. GI screens, in which the growth of double mutants bearing two deleted or inactivated genes is measured and compared to the corresponding single mutants, can illuminate epistatic dependencies between loci and hence provide a means to query and discover novel functional relationships(2). Large-scale GI maps have been reported for eukaryotic organisms like yeast(3-7), but GI information remains sparse for prokaryotes(8), which hinders the functional annotation of bacterial genomes. To this end, we and others have developed high-throughput quantitative bacterial GI screening methods(9, 10). Here, we present the key steps required to perform quantitative E. coli Synthetic Genetic Array (eSGA) screening procedure on a genome-scale(9), using natural bacterial conjugation and homologous recombination to systemically generate and measure the fitness of large numbers of double mutants in a colony array format. Briefly, a robot is used to transfer, through conjugation, chloramphenicol (Cm) - marked mutant alleles from engineered Hfr (High frequency of recombination) 'donor strains' into an ordered array of kanamycin (Kan) - marked F- recipient strains. Typically, we use loss-of-function single mutants bearing non-essential gene deletions (e.g. the 'Keio' collection(11)) and essential gene hypomorphic mutations (i.e. alleles conferring reduced protein expression, stability, or activity(9, 12, 13)) to query the functional associations of non-essential and essential genes, respectively. After conjugation and ensuing genetic exchange mediated by homologous recombination, the resulting double mutants are selected on solid medium containing both antibiotics. After outgrowth, the plates are digitally imaged and colony sizes are quantitatively scored using an in-house automated image processing system(14). GIs are revealed when the growth rate of a double mutant is either significantly better or worse than expected(9). Aggravating (or negative) GIs often result between loss-of-function mutations in pairs of genes from compensatory pathways that impinge on the same essential process(2). Here, the loss of a single gene is buffered, such that either single mutant is viable. However, the loss of both pathways is deleterious and results in synthetic lethality or sickness (i.e. slow growth). Conversely, alleviating (or positive) interactions can occur between genes in the same pathway or protein complex(2) as the deletion of either gene alone is often sufficient to perturb the normal function of the pathway or complex such that additional perturbations do not reduce activity, and hence growth, further. Overall, systematically identifying and analyzing GI networks can provide unbiased, global maps of the functional relationships between large numbers of genes, from which pathway-level information missed by other approaches can be inferred(9).
Similar articles
-
Array-based synthetic genetic screens to map bacterial pathways and functional networks in Escherichia coli.Methods Mol Biol. 2011;765:125-53. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-197-0_9. Methods Mol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21815091
-
Array-based synthetic genetic screens to map bacterial pathways and functional networks in Escherichia coli.Methods Mol Biol. 2011;781:99-126. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-276-2_7. Methods Mol Biol. 2011. PMID: 21877280
-
Quantitative Genetic Screens for Mapping Bacterial Pathways and Functional Networks.Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2381:3-37. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1740-3_1. Methods Mol Biol. 2021. PMID: 34590268
-
Genetic interaction networks: better understand to better predict.Front Genet. 2013 Dec 17;4:290. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00290. Front Genet. 2013. PMID: 24381582 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systems-level approaches for identifying and analyzing genetic interaction networks in Escherichia coli and extensions to other prokaryotes.Mol Biosyst. 2009 Dec;5(12):1439-55. doi: 10.1039/B907407d. Epub 2009 Jul 31. Mol Biosyst. 2009. PMID: 19763343 Review.
Cited by
-
Functional profiling in Streptococcus mutans: construction and examination of a genomic collection of gene deletion mutants.Mol Oral Microbiol. 2015 Dec;30(6):474-95. doi: 10.1111/omi.12107. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Mol Oral Microbiol. 2015. PMID: 25973955 Free PMC article.
-
A Gaussian process-based definition reveals new and bona fide genetic interactions compared to a multiplicative model in the Gram-negative Escherichia coli.Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 1;36(3):880-889. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz673. Bioinformatics. 2020. PMID: 31504172 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptation of the periplasm to maintain spatial constraints essential for cell envelope processes and cell viability.Elife. 2022 Jan 27;11:e73516. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73516. Elife. 2022. PMID: 35084330 Free PMC article.
-
ZapG (YhcB/DUF1043), a novel cell division protein in gamma-proteobacteria linking the Z-ring to septal peptidoglycan synthesis.J Biol Chem. 2021 Jan-Jun;296:100700. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100700. Epub 2021 Apr 23. J Biol Chem. 2021. PMID: 33895137 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Myers CL, Andrews B, Boone C. Charting the genetic interaction map of a cell. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011;22:66–74. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials