Physicians' and midlevel providers' awareness of lifetime radiation-attributable cancer risk associated with commonly performed CT studies: relationship to practice behavior
- PMID: 23169726
- PMCID: PMC3676280
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.8581
Physicians' and midlevel providers' awareness of lifetime radiation-attributable cancer risk associated with commonly performed CT studies: relationship to practice behavior
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate emergency department (ED) providers' knowledge of the lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation from commonly performed CT scans and its association with the ordering providers' risk-benefit analysis before ordering the examination. This study further explores factors that may influence a provider's selection of a particular diagnostic imaging study in an ED setting.
Materials and methods: Sixty-seven ED providers at the University of Rochester Medical Center completed a multiple-choice questionnaire. The questions were derived to assess an individual provider's awareness of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation from a diagnostic CT scan of the abdomen or pelvis and the provider's behavior toward risk-benefit analysis before ordering the examination. The association between the questions and years since completion of clinical training was determined using the Spearman correlation test. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used for the same questions to predict the knowledge of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation.
Results: Fewer than 30% of ED providers possessed accurate knowledge of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation (p = 0.025). Providers with greater clinical experience, although lacking in the knowledge of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation, were more likely to consider patients' radiation dose history and to conduct a risk-benefit analysis and were less likely to order a CT scan unnecessarily. Clinical experience was negatively correlated with perceived unnecessary use of CT scans (p = 0.01).
Conclusion: A large proportion of ED providers are unaware of the lifetime risk of carcinogenesis associated with commonly performed CT scans. Clinical experience, not knowledge of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation, is significantly associated with beneficial behavior toward the use of CT.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Emergency department patient knowledge and physician communication regarding CT scans.Emerg Med J. 2014 Oct;31(10):824-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202294. Epub 2013 Jul 14. Emerg Med J. 2014. PMID: 23851128
-
Emergency physicians' attitudes and preferences regarding computed tomography, radiation exposure, and imaging decision support.Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;21(7):768-77. doi: 10.1111/acem.12410. Acad Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 25125272 Free PMC article.
-
Radiation exposure among patients with the highest CT scan utilization in the emergency department.Emerg Radiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s10140-013-1142-8. Epub 2013 Jul 14. Emerg Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23852432
-
Communicating radiation risk to patients and referring physicians in the emergency department setting.Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20150868. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150868. Epub 2016 Jan 11. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26647958 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Radiation dose awareness and disclosure practice in paediatric emergency medicine: how far have we come?Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1061):20160022. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160022. Epub 2016 Feb 12. Br J Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26828973 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the impact of a brief educational message on clinicians' awareness of risks of ionising-radiation exposure in imaging investigations: a pilot pre-post intervention study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4712-y. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31727071 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency Department Patients' Perceptions of Radiation From Medical Imaging.WMJ. 2016 Feb;115(1):22-8. WMJ. 2016. PMID: 27057576 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a nudge intervention providing simple feedback to clinicians of the consequence of radiation exposure on demand for computed tomography: a controlled study.Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Jul;19(4):290-293. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-4-290. Clin Med (Lond). 2019. PMID: 31308105 Free PMC article.
-
Hospital doctors' attitudes to brief educational messages that aim to modify diagnostic test requests: a qualitative study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1087-2. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020. PMID: 32349739 Free PMC article.
-
Cumulative radiation exposure from imaging procedures and associated lifetime cancer risk for patients with lymphoma.Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 17;6:35181. doi: 10.1038/srep35181. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27748377 Free PMC article.
References
-
- UNSCEAR 2000. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, 2000 Report to the General Assembly with Annexes. New York, NY: United Nations; 2000.
-
- Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res. 2007;168:1–64. - PubMed
-
- Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIRVII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2006.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical