Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;199(6):1328-36.
doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8581.

Physicians' and midlevel providers' awareness of lifetime radiation-attributable cancer risk associated with commonly performed CT studies: relationship to practice behavior

Affiliations

Physicians' and midlevel providers' awareness of lifetime radiation-attributable cancer risk associated with commonly performed CT studies: relationship to practice behavior

Savita Puri et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate emergency department (ED) providers' knowledge of the lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation from commonly performed CT scans and its association with the ordering providers' risk-benefit analysis before ordering the examination. This study further explores factors that may influence a provider's selection of a particular diagnostic imaging study in an ED setting.

Materials and methods: Sixty-seven ED providers at the University of Rochester Medical Center completed a multiple-choice questionnaire. The questions were derived to assess an individual provider's awareness of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation from a diagnostic CT scan of the abdomen or pelvis and the provider's behavior toward risk-benefit analysis before ordering the examination. The association between the questions and years since completion of clinical training was determined using the Spearman correlation test. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used for the same questions to predict the knowledge of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation.

Results: Fewer than 30% of ED providers possessed accurate knowledge of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation (p = 0.025). Providers with greater clinical experience, although lacking in the knowledge of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation, were more likely to consider patients' radiation dose history and to conduct a risk-benefit analysis and were less likely to order a CT scan unnecessarily. Clinical experience was negatively correlated with perceived unnecessary use of CT scans (p = 0.01).

Conclusion: A large proportion of ED providers are unaware of the lifetime risk of carcinogenesis associated with commonly performed CT scans. Clinical experience, not knowledge of lifetime cancer risk attributable to radiation, is significantly associated with beneficial behavior toward the use of CT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Frequencies of Estimated Lifetime Increased Risk from One CTAP
QUESTION: IN YOUR JUDGMENT AS A RESULT OF A CT SCAN OF THE ABDOMEN AND PELVIS, BY HOW MUCH IS THE LIFETIME RISK OF DEVELOPING A CANCER INCREASED?”
Figure 2
Figure 2. Frequency distribution of awareness of difference in radiation risk by age
QUESTION: GIVEN THE SAME AMOUNT OF RADIATION DOSE FROM A CT SCAN; DO YOUNGER PATIENTS LESS THAN 30 YRS OF AGE HAVE A HIGHER RISK OF DEVELOPING A CANCER THAN THOSE OVER THE AGE OF 50 YRS?
Figure 3
Figure 3. Frequency Distribution of Perceived Unnecessary Use of CT Scan
QUESTION: HOW OFTEN IN YOUR PRACTICE AFTER OBTAINING THE RESULTS OFTHE CT SCANS YOU FEEL THAT THE CT SCAN WAS PROBABLY UNNECESSARY?

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UNSCEAR 2000. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, 2000 Report to the General Assembly with Annexes. New York, NY: United Nations; 2000.
    1. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:13761–13766. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, et al. Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res. 2007;168:1–64. - PubMed
    1. Cardis E, Vrijheid M, Blettner M, et al. Risk of cancer after low doses of ionizing radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries. BMJ. 2005;331:77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board, Division on Earth and Life Studies, National Research Council of the National Academies. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIRVII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2006.

Publication types