Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence
- PMID: 23171096
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206809
Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence
Abstract
Background: To reduce mortality, screening must detect life-threatening disease at an earlier, more curable stage. Effective cancer-screening programs therefore both increase the incidence of cancer detected at an early stage and decrease the incidence of cancer presenting at a late stage.
Methods: We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data to examine trends from 1976 through 2008 in the incidence of early-stage breast cancer (ductal carcinoma in situ and localized disease) and late-stage breast cancer (regional and distant disease) among women 40 years of age or older.
Results: The introduction of screening mammography in the United States has been associated with a doubling in the number of cases of early-stage breast cancer that are detected each year, from 112 to 234 cases per 100,000 women--an absolute increase of 122 cases per 100,000 women. Concomitantly, the rate at which women present with late-stage cancer has decreased by 8%, from 102 to 94 cases per 100,000 women--an absolute decrease of 8 cases per 100,000 women. With the assumption of a constant underlying disease burden, only 8 of the 122 additional early-stage cancers diagnosed were expected to progress to advanced disease. After excluding the transient excess incidence associated with hormone-replacement therapy and adjusting for trends in the incidence of breast cancer among women younger than 40 years of age, we estimated that breast cancer was overdiagnosed (i.e., tumors were detected on screening that would never have led to clinical symptoms) in 1.3 million U.S. women in the past 30 years. We estimated that in 2008, breast cancer was overdiagnosed in more than 70,000 women; this accounted for 31% of all breast cancers diagnosed.
Conclusions: Despite substantial increases in the number of cases of early-stage breast cancer detected, screening mammography has only marginally reduced the rate at which women present with advanced cancer. Although it is not certain which women have been affected, the imbalance suggests that there is substantial overdiagnosis, accounting for nearly a third of all newly diagnosed breast cancers, and that screening is having, at best, only a small effect on the rate of death from breast cancer.
Comment in
-
What's a girl to do?Nat Rev Cancer. 2013 Jan;13(1):9. doi: 10.1038/nrc3425. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23258167 No abstract available.
-
Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence.N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1215494. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23406034 No abstract available.
-
Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence.N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):677. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1215494. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23406035 No abstract available.
-
Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence.N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):677-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1215494. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23406036 No abstract available.
-
Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence.N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):678. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1215494. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23406037 No abstract available.
-
Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence.N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14;368(7):678-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1215494. N Engl J Med. 2013. PMID: 23406038 No abstract available.
-
[What is the benefit of mammography? -- mammography screening: careful consideration required].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013 Mar;138(9):410. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329036. Epub 2013 Feb 19. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013. PMID: 23423934 German. No abstract available.
-
[Modest effect of mammography screenings].Praxis (Bern 1994). 2013 Feb 27;102(5):303. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a001196. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2013. PMID: 23446242 German. No abstract available.
-
The impact of mammography screening on breast cancer incidence.J Comp Eff Res. 2013 Mar;2(2):113-6. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.3. J Comp Eff Res. 2013. PMID: 24236553
-
CAGS and ACS evidence based reviews in surgery. 48. What is the effect of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence?Can J Surg. 2014 Feb;57(1):67-9. doi: 10.1503/cjs.032913. Can J Surg. 2014. PMID: 24461269 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Overdiagnosing overdiagnosis.Oncologist. 2014 Feb;19(2):103-6. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0036. Oncologist. 2014. PMID: 24536050 Free PMC article.
-
Screening mammography may be less effective than thought.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jul-Aug;59(4):465-7. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12215_1. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 25215355 No abstract available.
-
The Faulty Analysis of Breast Cancer Screening Data.Acad Radiol. 2016 Jan;23(1):116-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.08.035. Epub 2015 Dec 1. Acad Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26598484 No abstract available.
-
Point: The New England Journal of Medicine Article Suggesting Overdiagnosis From Mammography Screening Is Scientifically Incorrect and Should Be Withdrawn.J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Nov;13(11S):R50-R52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.026. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27814814 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness.N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1438-1447. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600249. N Engl J Med. 2016. PMID: 27732805
-
Reduction in late-stage breast cancer incidence in the mammography era: Implications for overdiagnosis of invasive cancer.Cancer. 2014 Sep 1;120(17):2649-56. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28784. Epub 2014 May 19. Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24840597
-
Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.Eur J Cancer. 2018 Feb;90:34-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 20. Eur J Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29272783
-
Mammography for symptomless women--not so wise?Climacteric. 2013 Jun;16(3):313-5. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2013.771463. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Climacteric. 2013. PMID: 23425505 Review.
-
Increases in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast in relation to mammography: a dilemma.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):151-6. doi: 10.1093/jncimono/1997.22.151. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997. PMID: 9709292 Review.
Cited by
-
Sprouty4 negatively regulates ERK/MAPK signaling and the transition from in situ to invasive breast ductal carcinoma.PLoS One. 2021 May 28;16(5):e0252314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252314. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34048471 Free PMC article.
-
Medical Debates and Medical Reversal.J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1729-30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3481-5. J Gen Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26224155 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Implications of obesity and insulin resistance for the treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.Br J Cancer. 2024 Dec;131(11):1724-1736. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02833-1. Epub 2024 Sep 9. Br J Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39251829 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Molecular Mechanisms Contributing Bacterial Infections to the Incidence of Various Types of Cancer.Mediators Inflamm. 2020 Jul 8;2020:4070419. doi: 10.1155/2020/4070419. eCollection 2020. Mediators Inflamm. 2020. PMID: 32724295 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Willingness to participate in mammography screening: a randomized controlled questionnaire study of responses to two patient information leaflets with different factual content.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jan 30;112(5):61-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0061. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015. PMID: 25686383 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous