Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Nov 21:12:412.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-412.

User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

User fee exemptions and excessive household spending for normal delivery in Burkina Faso: the need for careful implementation

Amal Ben Ameur et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In 2006, the Parliament of Burkina Faso passed a policy to reduce the direct costs of obstetric services and neonatal care in the country's health centres, aiming to lower the country's high national maternal mortality and morbidity rates. Implementation was via a "partial exemption" covering 80% of the costs. In 2008 the German NGO HELP launched a pilot project in two health districts to eliminate the remaining 20% of user fees. Regardless of any exemptions, women giving birth in Burkina Faso's health centres face additional expenses that often represent an additional barrier to accessing health services. We compared the total cost of giving birth in health centres offering partial exemption versus those with full exemption to assess the impact on additional out-of-pocket fees.

Methods: A case-control study was performed to compare medical expenses. Case subjects were women who gave birth in 12 health centres located in the Dori and Sebba districts, where HELP provided full fee exemption for obstetric services and neonatal care. Controls were from six health centres in the neighbouring Djibo district where a partial fee exemption was in place. A random sample of approximately 50 women per health centre was selected for a total of 870 women.

Results: There was an implementation gap regarding the full exemption for obstetric services and neonatal care. Only 1.1% of the sample from Sebba but 17.5% of the group from Dori had excessive spending on birth related costs, indicating that women who delivered in Sebba were much less exposed to excessive medical expenses than women from Dori. Additional out-of-pocket fees in the full exemption health districts took into account household ability to pay, with poorer women generally paying less.

Conclusions: We found that the elimination of fees for facility-based births benefits especially the poorest households. The existence of excessive spending related to direct costs of giving birth is of concern, making it urgent for the government to remove all direct fees for obstetric and neonatal care. However, the policy of completely abolishing user fees is insufficient; the implementation process must have a thorough monitoring system to reduce implementation gaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of total medical delivery expenses in the three districts. Median, interquartile gap and extreme values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Richard F, Witter S, de Brouwere V. Innovative Approaches to Reducing Financial Barriers to Obstetric Care in Low-Income Countries. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:1845–1852. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179689. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nanda P. Gender dimensions of user fees: implications for women's utilization of health care. Reprod Health Matters. 2002;10(20):127–134. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(02)00083-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McIntyre D, Thiede M, Dahlgren G, Whitehead M. What are the economic consequences for households of illness and of paying for health care in low- and middle-income country contexts? Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:858–865. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. African Union. Fifteenth Ordinary Session 25–27 July 2010, Assembly of the African Union. Report on actions on maternal, newborn and child health and development in Africa by 2015. Kampala, Uganda; 2010. http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/news/2010/kampa....
    1. Meessen B, Hercot D, Noirhomme M, Ridde V, Tibouti A, Tashobya CK, Gilson L. Removing user fees in the health sector: a review of policy processes in six sub-Saharan African countries. Health Pol Plann. 2011;26(Suppl 2):ii16–ii29. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms