Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan;17(1):212-8.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004806. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

Drop the Salt! Assessing the impact of a public health advocacy strategy on Australian government policy on salt

Affiliations
Review

Drop the Salt! Assessing the impact of a public health advocacy strategy on Australian government policy on salt

Jacqui Webster et al. Public Health Nutr. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: In 2007 the Australian Division of World Action on Salt and Health (AWASH) launched a campaign to encourage the Australian government to take action to reduce population salt intake. The objective of the present research was to assess the impact of the Drop the Salt! campaign on government policy.

Design: A review of government activities related to salt reduction was conducted and an advocacy strategy implemented to increase government action on salt. Advocacy actions were documented and the resulting outcomes identified. An analysis of stakeholder views on the effectiveness of the advocacy strategy was also undertaken. Settings Advocacy activities were coordinated through AWASH at the George Institute for Global Health in Sydney.

Subjects: All relevant State and Federal government statements and actions were reviewed and thirteen stakeholders with known interests or responsibilities regarding dietary salt, including food industry, government and health organisations, were interviewed.

Results: Stakeholder analysis affirmed that AWASH influenced the government's agenda on salt reduction and four key outputs were attributed to the campaign: (i) the Food Regulation Standing Committee discussions on salt, (ii) the Food and Health Dialogue salt targets, (iii) National Health and Medical Research Council partnership funding and (iv) the New South Wales Premier's Forum on Fast Foods.

Conclusions: While it is not possible to definitively attribute changes in government policy to one organisation, stakeholder research indicated that the AWASH campaign increased the priority of salt reduction on the government's agenda. However, a coordinated government strategy on salt reduction is still required to ensure that the potential health benefits are fully realised.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing & National Health and Medical Research Council (2006) Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
    1. National Health and Medical Research Council (2003) Dietary Guidelines for Australian Adults. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
    1. Havas S, Dickinson B & Wilson M (2007) The urgent need to reduce sodium consumption. JAMA 298, 1439–1441. - PubMed
    1. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group (1988) Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure: results for 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion. BMJ 329, 319–328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration (2003) Blood pressure and cardiovascular diseases in the Asia-Pacific region. J Hypertens 21, 707–716. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances