Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 May 1;20(3):526-34.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001263. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

Online disease management of diabetes: engaging and motivating patients online with enhanced resources-diabetes (EMPOWER-D), a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Online disease management of diabetes: engaging and motivating patients online with enhanced resources-diabetes (EMPOWER-D), a randomized controlled trial

Paul C Tang et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate an online disease management system supporting patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.

Materials and methods: Engaging and Motivating Patients Online With Enhanced Resources for Diabetes was a 12-month parallel randomized controlled trial of 415 patients with type 2 diabetes with baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) values ≥7.5% from primary care sites sharing an electronic health record. The intervention included: (1) wirelessly uploaded home glucometer readings with graphical feedback; (2) comprehensive patient-specific diabetes summary status report; (3) nutrition and exercise logs; (4) insulin record; (5) online messaging with the patient's health team; (6) nurse care manager and dietitian providing advice and medication management; and (7) personalized text and video educational 'nuggets' dispensed electronically by the care team. A1C was the primary outcome variable.

Results: Compared with usual care (UC, n=189), patients in the intervention (INT, n=193) group had significantly reduced A1C at 6 months (-1.32% INT vs -0.66% UC; p<0.001). At 12 months, the differences were not significant (-1.14% INT vs -0.95% UC; p=0.133). In post hoc analysis, significantly more INT patients had improved diabetes control (>0.5% reduction in A1C) than UC patients at 12 months (69.9 (95% CI 63.2 to 76.5) vs 55.4 (95% CI 48.4 to 62.5); p=0.006).

Conclusions: A nurse-led, multidisciplinary health team can manage a population of diabetic patients in an online disease management program. INT patients achieved greater decreases in A1C at 6 months than UC patients, but the differences were not sustained at 12 months. More INT than UC patients achieved improvement in A1C (>0.5% decrease). Trial registered in clinical trials.gov: #NCT00542204.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diabetes status report.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Recruitment flow diagram. PCP, primary care provider.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient exclusion by criterion. CM, care management; DM, diabetes mellitus; Dx, diagnosis; PAMF, Palo Alto Medical Foundation; Tx, treatment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plot of average estimated daily hemoglobin A1C for intervention versus usual care. Estimated daily A1C levels were calculated using a linear interpolation between actual A1C measurements.

References

    1. Cheung BM, Ong KL, Cherny SS, et al. Diabetes prevalence and therapeutic target achievement in the United States, 1999 to 2006. Am J Med 2009;122:443–53 - PubMed
    1. Engelgau MM, Geiss LS, Saaddine JB, et al. The evolving diabetes burden in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:945–50 - PubMed
    1. Hoerger TJ, Segel JE, Gregg EW, et al. Is glycemic control improving in U.S. adults? Diabetes Care 2008;31:81–6 - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996;74:511–44 - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ 2000;320:569–72 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data