Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 22:11:384.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-384.

Validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the quantification of human IgG directed against the repeat region of the circumsporozoite protein of the parasite Plasmodium falciparum

Affiliations

Validation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the quantification of human IgG directed against the repeat region of the circumsporozoite protein of the parasite Plasmodium falciparum

Frederic Clement et al. Malar J. .

Abstract

Background: Several pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccines based on the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) antigen of Plasmodium falciparum are in clinical development. Vaccine immunogenicity is commonly evaluated by the determination of anti-CSP antibody levels using IgG-based assays, but no standard assay is available to allow comparison of the different vaccines.

Methods: The validation of an anti-CSP repeat region enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is described. This assay is based on the binding of serum antibodies to R32LR, a recombinant protein composed of the repeat region of P. falciparum CSP. In addition to the original recombinant R32LR, an easy to purify recombinant His-tagged R32LR protein has been constructed to be used as solid phase antigen in the assay. Also, hybridoma cell lines have been generated producing human anti-R32LR monoclonal antibodies to be used as a potential inexhaustible source of anti-CSP repeats standard, instead of a reference serum.

Results: The anti-CSP repeats ELISA was shown to be robust, specific and linear within the analytical range, and adequately fulfilled all validation criteria as defined in the ICH guidelines. Furthermore, the coefficient of variation for repeatability and intermediate precision did not exceed 23%. Non-interference was demonstrated for R32LR-binding sera, and the assay was shown to be stable over time.

Conclusions: This ELISA, specific for antibodies directed against the CSP repeat region, can be used as a standard assay for the determination of humoral immunogenicity in the development of any CSP-based P. falciparum malaria vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Specificity demonstrated by inhibition of a serially diluted sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of heat inactivated samples with non-inactivated samples. A, Deming regression (ultrastructural model) of non-inactivated serum (untreated‘) as a function of inactivated serum samples (inactivated) where variances are considered as equal. B, Plot of the bias - Deming regression represented with ratios (inactivated/untreated) versus inactivated (ultrastructural model) where variances are considered as equal.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Stability of quality control samples.A, Stability of the Low Titer Quality control sample measured in each plate of the ELISA run (with the lower and upper rejection limit). B, Stability of the High Titer Quality control sample measured in each plate of the ELISA run (with the lower and upper rejection limit).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of His-R32LR with the original R32LR as coating antigen.A, Deming regression (ultrastructural model) of His-R32LR as a function of R32LR where variances are considered as equal. B, Plot of the bias - Deming regression represented with ratios (His-R32LR/R32LR) versus R32LR (ultrastructural model) where variances are considered as equal.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Optical density of serial dilutions of the original standard serum obtained from an exploratory malaria vaccine recipient, compared to the monoclonal MAL2A antibody and the monoclonal MAL1C antibody.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. World malaria report. 2011. http://www.who.int/malaria/world_malaria_report_2011/9789241564403_eng.pdf.
    1. Murray CJL, Rosenfeld LC, Lim SS, Andrews KG, Foreman KJ, Haring D, Fullman N, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Lopez AD. Global malaria mortality between 1980 and 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2012;379:413–431. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60034-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Tables of malaria vaccine projects globally. http://www.who.int/vaccine_research/links/Rainbow/en/index.html.
    1. Ballou WR. The development of the RTS, S malaria vaccine candidate: challenges and lessons. Parasite Immunol. 2009;31:492–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01143.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leach A, Vekemans J, Lievens M, Ofori-Anyinam O, Cahill C, Owusu-Agyei S, Abdulla S, Macete E, Njuguna P, Savarese B, Loucq C, Ballou WR. The Clinical Trials Partnership Committee. Design of a phase III multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy of the RTS, S/AS01 malaria vaccine in children across diverse transmission settings in Africa. Malar J. 2011;10:224. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-224. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources