Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-12-S1-S9. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

Difficult colonoscopies in the propofol era

Fabrizio Cardin  1 , Nadia Minicuci, Federico Campigotto, Alessandra Andreotti, Elisa Granziaera, Barbara Donà, Bruno Martella, Claudio Terranova, Carmelo Militello
Affiliations

Difficult colonoscopies in the propofol era

Fabrizio Cardin et al. BMC Surg. 2012.

Abstract

Background: To study the relationship between endoscopic practice and adverse events during colonoscopy under standard deep sedation induced and monitored by an anesthetist.

Methods: We investigated the routine activity of an endoscopy center at the Padova University teaching hospital. We considered not only endoscopic and cardiorespiratory complications, but also the need to use high-dose propofol to complete the procedure, and the inability to complete the procedure. Variables relating to the patient's clinical conditions, bowel preparation, the endoscopist's and the anesthetist's experience, and the duration of the procedure were input in the model.

Results: 617 procedures under deep sedation were performed with a 5% rate of adverse events. The average dose of propofol used was 2.6 ± 1.2 mg/kg. In all, 14 endoscopists and 42 anesthetists were involved in the procedures. The logistic regression analysis identified female gender (OR=2.3), having the colonoscopy performed by a less experienced endoscopist (OR=1.9), inadequate bowel preparation (OR=3.2) and a procedure lasting longer than 17.5 minutes (OR=1.6) as the main risk factors for complications. An ASA score of 2 carried a 50% risk reduction (OR=0.5).

Discussion and conclusions: Our model showed that none of the variables relating to anesthesiological issues influenced which procedures would prove difficult.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ. SAGES Colonoscopy Study Outcomes Group. A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies. Reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:251–261. doi: 10.1007/s004640080147. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ball JE, Osbourne J, Jowett S, Pellen M, Welfare MR. Quality improvement program to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study. BMJ. 2004;329:665–667. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7467.665. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boscolo-Berto R, Viel G, Cecchi R, Terranova C, Vogliardi S, Bajanowski T, Ferrara SD. Journals publishing bio-medicolegal research in Europe. Int J Legal Med. 2012;126(1):129–37. doi: 10.1007/s00414-011-0620-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, Fanelli RD, Hyman N, Shen B, Wasco KE. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1147–1160. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-0152-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rex DK. Three challenges: propofol, colonoscopy by undertrained physicians, and CT colonography. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(3):510–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41885.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types