Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Nov 22:12:135.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-135.

Striving for scientific stringency: a re-analysis of a randomised controlled trial considering first-time mothers' obstetric outcomes in relation to birth position

Li Thies-Lagergren  1 , Linda J Kvist, Kyllike Christensson, Ingegerd Hildingsson
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Striving for scientific stringency: a re-analysis of a randomised controlled trial considering first-time mothers' obstetric outcomes in relation to birth position

Li Thies-Lagergren et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare maternal labour and birth outcomes between women who gave birth on a birth seat or in any other position for vaginal birth and further, to study the relationship between synthetic oxytocin augmentation and maternal blood loss, in a stratified sample.

Methods: A re-analysis of a randomized controlled trial in Sweden. An on-treatment analysis was used to study obstetrical outcomes for nulliparous women who gave birth on a birth seat (birth seat group) compared to birth in any other position for vaginal birth (control group). Data were collected between November 2006 and July 2009. The outcome measurements included perineal outcome, post partum blood loss, epidural analgesia, synthetic oxytocin augmentation and duration of labour.

Results: The major findings of this paper were that women giving birth on the birth seat had shorter duration of labour and were significantly less likely to receive synthetic oxytocin for augmentation in the second stage of labour. Significantly more women had an increased blood loss when giving birth on the birth seat, but had no difference in perineal outcomes. Blood loss was increased regardless of birth position if women had been exposed to synthetic oxytocin augmentation during the first stage of labour.

Conclusions: The results of this analysis imply that women with a straightforward birth process may well benefit from giving birth on a birth seat without risk for any adverse obstetrical outcomes. However it is important to bear in mind that, women who received synthetic oxytocin during the first stage of labour may have an increased risk for greater blood loss when giving birth on a birth seat. Finally it is of vital importance to scrutinize the influence of synthetic oxytocin administered during the first stage of labour on blood loss postpartum, since excessive blood loss is a well-documented cause of maternal mortality worldwide and may cause severe maternal morbidity in high-income countries.

Trial registration: Unique Protocol ID: NCT01182038 ( http://register.clinicaltrials.gov).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. O'dowd MJ, Philipp EE. The history of obstetrics and gynaecology. England: Parthenon Pub Group; 1994.
    1. Lewis G. Saving Mothers’ Lives: The Continuing Benefits for Maternal Health From the United Kingdom (UK) Confidential Enquires Into Maternal Deaths. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36(1):19–26. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.09.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Teijlingen E. A Critical Analysis of the Medical Model as used in the Study of Pregnancy and Childbirth. Sociological Research Online. 2005;10(2)
    1. Jordan RG, Murphy PA. Risk assessment and risk distortion: finding the balance. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009;54(3):191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tracy SK, Sullivan E, Wang YA, Black D, Tracy M. Birth outcomes associated with interventions in labour amongst low risk women: A population-based study. Women Birth. 2007;20(2):41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2007.03.005. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data