Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 7;31(3):500-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.023. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

The impact of maternally derived immunity on influenza A virus transmission in neonatal pig populations

Affiliations

The impact of maternally derived immunity on influenza A virus transmission in neonatal pig populations

Matt Allerson et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

The commonality of influenza A virus (IAV) exposure and vaccination on swine farms in the United States ensures that the majority of neonatal pigs will have some degree of maternal immunity to IAV. The influence of maternal immunity on IAV transmission in neonatal pig populations will impact virus prevalence and infection dynamics across pig populations. The main objective of this study was to assess the impact of maternally derived immunity on IAV transmission in an experimental setting. Neonatal pigs suckled colostrum and derived maternal (passive) immunity from sows in one of three treatment groups: (a) non-vaccinated control (CTRL) or vaccinated with (b) homologous (PASSV-HOM) or (c) heterologous (PASSV-HET) inactivated experimental IAV vaccines. Sentinel neonatal pigs derived from the groups above were challenged with IAV via direct contact with an experimentally infected pig (seeder pig) and monitored for IAV infection daily via nasal swab sampling. A susceptible-infectious-recovered (SIR) experimental model was used to obtain and estimate transmission parameters in each treatment group via a generalized linear model. All sentinel pigs in the CTRL (30/30) and PASSV-HET (30/30) groups were infected with IAV following contact with the seeder pigs and the reproduction ratio estimates (95% confidence interval) were 10.4 (6.6-15.8) and 7.1 (4.2-11.3), respectively. In contrast, 1/20 sentinel pigs in the PASSV-HOM group was infected following contact with the seeder pigs and the reproduction ratio estimate was significantly lower compared to the CTRL and PASSV-HET groups at 0.8 (0.1-3.7). Under the conditions of this study, IAV transmission was reduced in neonatal pigs with homologous maternal immunity compared to seronegative neonatal pigs and pigs with heterologous maternal immunity as defined in this study. This study provides estimates for IAV transmission in pigs with differing types of maternal immunity which may describe the influence of maternal immunity on IAV prevalence and infection dynamics in pig populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Influenza A Multiscreen ELISA S/N ratios (±SE) pre-contact and post-contact by treatment group. The black horizontal line represents the cutoff (≤0.673 is considered positive). a,b, cStatistically significant differences between groups at each time period (p < 0.05) *Statistically significant differences between pre-contact and post-contact paired samples (p < 0.05)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival curve from influenza virus infection by treatment group + Censored data a,b,cStatistically significant differences (p < 0.001), log-rank test
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of new cases (influenza virus infection) represented as the proportion of 10,000 simulations from the stochastic SIR model with initial values of (S=10, I=1, R=0) for each treatment group

References

    1. Chambers TM, Hinshaw VS, Kawaoka Y, Easterday BC, Webster RG. Influenza viral infection of swine in the United States 1988–1989. Arch Virol. 1991;116(1–4):261–5. - PubMed
    1. Hinshaw VS, Bean WJ, Jr, Webster RG, Easterday BC. The prevalence of influenza viruses in swine and the antigenic and genetic relatedness of influenza viruses from man and swine. Virology. 1978;84(1):51–62. - PubMed
    1. Olsen CW, Carey S, Hinshaw L, Karasin AI. Virologic and serologic surveillance for human, swine and avian influenza virus infections among pigs in the north-central United States. Arch Virol. 2000;145(7):1399–419. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Myers KP, Olsen CW, Gray GC. Cases of swine influenza in humans: a review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(8):1084–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forgie SE, Keenliside J, Wilkinson C, Webby R, Lu P, Sorensen O, et al. Swine outbreak of pandemic influenza A virus on a Canadian research farm supports human-to-swine transmission. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(1):10–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources