Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jun;34(6):497-501.
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1327661. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

Measurement accuracy of heart rate and respiratory rate during graded exercise and sustained exercise in the heat using the Zephyr BioHarness

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Measurement accuracy of heart rate and respiratory rate during graded exercise and sustained exercise in the heat using the Zephyr BioHarness

J-H Kim et al. Int J Sports Med. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

The Zephyr BioHarness was tested to determine the accuracy of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) measurements during 2 exercise protocols in conjunction with either a laboratory metabolic cart (Vmax) or a previously validated portable metabolic system (K4b2). In one protocol, HR and RR were measured using the BioHarness and Vmax during a graded exercise up to V˙O2max (n=12). In another protocol, HR and RR were measured using the BH and K4b2 during sustained exercise (30% and 50% V˙O2max for 20 min each) in a hot environment (30 °C, 50% relative humidity) (n=6). During the graded exercise, HR but not RR, obtained from the BioHarness was higher compared to the Vmax at baseline and 30% V˙O2max (p<0.05), but showed no significant difference at other stages with high correlation coefficients for both HR (r=0.87-0.96) and RR (r=0.90-0.99 above 30% V˙O2max). During the exercise in the heat, there were no significant differences between the BioHarness and K4b2 system. Correlation coefficients between the methods were low for HR but moderately to highly correlated (0.49-0.99) for RR. In conclusion, the BioHarness is comparable to Vmax and K4b2 over a wide range of V˙O2 during graded exercise and sustained exercise in the heat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors identify no conflicts of interest in the conduct of this study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bland-Altman plots for HR and RR measurements during GXT a, b and HET c, d. Center broken line: mean difference (bias) between the 2 methods. Upper and lower dot lines: mean difference ± 1 SD. Upper and lower solid lines: mean difference ± 1.96 SD (95 % limits of agreement).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams W. Measurement of breathing rate and volume in routinely performed daily activities. [Accessed on November 14, 2011];California Environmental protection Agency Air Resource Board Research Division Contract No, A033-205. 1993 Available from: http://www,arb,ca,gov/research/apr/past/a033-205.pdf.
    1. Al-Khalidi F, Saatchi R, Burke D, Elphick H, Tan S. Respiration rate monitoring methods: A review. Ped Pulmonol. 2011;46:523–529. - PubMed
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–160. - PubMed
    1. Caruana-Montaldo B, Gleeson K, Zwillich CW. The control of breathing in clinical practice. Chest. 2000;117:205–225. - PubMed
    1. Coca A, Roberge RJ, Williams WJ, Landsittel DP, Powell JB, Palmiero A. Physiological monitoring in firefighter ensembles: wearable plethysmographic sensor vest versus standard equipment. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010;7:109–114. - PubMed

Publication types