Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2012 Nov 24:7:198.
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-198.

Management of radiation oncology patients with a pacemaker or ICD: a new comprehensive practical guideline in The Netherlands. Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (NVRO)

Coen W Hurkmans  1 , Joost L Knegjens, Bing S Oei, Ad J J Maas, G J Uiterwaal, Arnoud J van der Borden, Marleen M J Ploegmakers, Lieselot van Erven; Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (NVRO)
Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Management of radiation oncology patients with a pacemaker or ICD: a new comprehensive practical guideline in The Netherlands. Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (NVRO)

Coen W Hurkmans et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Current clinical guidelines for the management of radiotherapy patients having either a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (both CIEDs: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices) do not cover modern radiotherapy techniques and do not take the patient's perspective into account. Available data on the frequency and cause of CIED failure during radiation therapy are limited and do not converge. The Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology (NVRO) initiated a multidisciplinary task group consisting of clinical physicists, cardiologists, radiation oncologists, pacemaker and ICD technologists to develop evidence based consensus guidelines for the management of CIED patients. CIED patients receiving radiotherapy should be categorised based on the chance of device failure and the clinical consequences in case of failure. Although there is no clear cut-off point nor a clear linear relationship, in general, chances of device failure increase with increasing doses. Clinical consequences of device failures like loss of pacing, carry the most risks in pacing dependent patients. Cumulative dose and pacing dependency have been combined to categorise patients into low, medium and high risk groups. Patients receiving a dose of less than 2 Gy to their CIED are categorised as low risk, unless pacing dependent since then they are medium risk. Between 2 and 10 Gy, all patients are categorised as medium risk, while above 10 Gy every patient is categorised as high risk. Measures to secure patient safety are described for each category. This guideline for the management of CIED patients receiving radiotherapy takes into account modern radiotherapy techniques, CIED technology, the patients' perspective and the practical aspects necessary for the safe management of these patients. The guideline is implemented in The Netherlands in 2012 and is expected to find clinical acceptance outside The Netherlands as well.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of Dutch guidelines. *Estimation of dose in case of a pectoral placed CIED.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Crossley GH, Poole JE, Rozner MA. et al. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the perioperative management of patients with implantable defibrillators, pacemakers and arrhythmia monitors: facilities and patient management this document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1114–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solan AN, Solan MJ, Bednarz G. et al. Treatment of patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators during radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:897–904. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.02.038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wadasadawala T, Pandey A, Agarwal JP. et al. Radiation therapy with implanted cardiac pacemaker devices: a clinical and dosimetric analysis of patients and proposed precautions. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2011;23:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.08.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hudson F, Coulshed D, D'Souza E. et al. Effect of radiation therapy on the latest generation of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010;54:53–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02138.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snow JS, Kalenderian D, Colasacco JA. et al. Implanted devices and electromagnetic interference: case presentations and review. J Invasive Cardiol. 1995;7:25–32. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms