Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification and diagnosis for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine
- PMID: 23179977
- PMCID: PMC3540306
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2573-8
Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification and diagnosis for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine
Abstract
Purpose: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) of the cervical spine has been classified into four types by lateral plain radiographs, but the reliability of the classification and of the diagnosis of either cervical OPLL or cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) was unknown. We investigated the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the classification and diagnosis for OPLL by radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images.
Methods: A total of 16 observers classified each patient's images into five groups; OPLL continuous, segmental, mixed, circumscribed type, or CSM. To evaluate interobserver reliability, the observers first classified only radiograph images, and next both radiographs and CT images. On another day they followed the same procedure to evaluate intraobserver reliability. We also evaluated interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the diagnosis of either cervical OPLL or CSM.
Results: Interobserver reliability of the classification with radiographs only showed moderate agreement, but interobserver reliability with both radiographs and CT images showed substantial agreement. Intraobserver of reliability the classification was also improved by additional CT images. Interobserver reliability of the diagnosis with both radiographs and CT images was almost similar to with radiographs only. Intraobserver reliability of the diagnosis was improved by additional CT images.
Conclusions: This study suggested that the reliability of the classification and diagnosis for cervical OPLL was improved by additional CT images. We propose that diagnostic criteria for OPLL include both radiographs and CT images.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Inter- and intra-observer variability of a cervical OPLL classification using reconstructed CT images.Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Mar;2(1):8-12. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.1.8. Epub 2010 Feb 4. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010. PMID: 20190995 Free PMC article.
-
New classification system for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament using CT images.J Orthop Sci. 2014 Jul;19(4):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00776-014-0577-4. Epub 2014 May 10. J Orthop Sci. 2014. PMID: 24817494
-
Risk of spinal cord injury in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a national cohort study.Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jun;40(6):E4. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS1663. Neurosurg Focus. 2016. PMID: 27246487
-
[Updates on ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Image diagnosis of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament and associated diseases].Clin Calcium. 2009 Oct;19(10):1426-34. Clin Calcium. 2009. PMID: 19794250 Review. Japanese.
-
Cervical myelopathy resulting from combined ossification of the ligamentum flavum and posterior longitudinal ligament: report of two cases and literature review.Spine J. 2013 Jan;13(1):e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.038. Epub 2012 Dec 21. Spine J. 2013. PMID: 23266147 Review.
Cited by
-
Cervical spinal computed tomography utilizing model-based iterative reconstruction reduces radiation to an equivalent of three cervical X-rays.Eur Spine J. 2020 Nov;29(11):2804-2813. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06426-3. Epub 2020 May 9. Eur Spine J. 2020. PMID: 32388669
-
Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Outcomes of Nonoperative and Operative Management.Global Spine J. 2016 Mar;6(2):195-204. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556580. Epub 2015 Jun 30. Global Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26933622 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ossification of Spinal Ligaments, 2019: 3. Diagnosis of OPLL.Spine Surg Relat Res. 2021 Sep 27;5(5):325-327. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0118. eCollection 2021. Spine Surg Relat Res. 2021. PMID: 34708166 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Automated detection of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in plain lateral radiographs of the cervical spine using a convolutional neural network.Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 16;11(1):12702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92160-9. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34135404 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Classification Systems for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):85-103. doi: 10.1177/2192568217720421. Epub 2018 Aug 15. Global Spine J. 2019. PMID: 30775213 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Tsukimoto H. A case report-autopsy of syndrome of compression of spinal cord owing to ossification within spinal canal of cervical spines. Arch Jpn Chir. 1960;29:1003–1007.
-
- Sakou T, Matsunaga S. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Jpn Spine Res Soc. 1996;7:437–448.
-
- Terayama K, Kurokawa T, Seki H (1975) National survey of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. In: Investigation Committee 1975 report on the ossification of the spinal ligaments of the Japanese Ministry of Public Health and Welfare, pp 8–33 (in Japanese)
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources