Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Nov 26:10:254.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-254.

Undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact of three histological types

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma: prognostic impact of three histological types

Han Hong Lee et al. World J Surg Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: The prognostic value of the three constituents of undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma remains unclear. The present study assessed the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of undifferentiated-type mucinous adenocarcinoma (uMAC) and signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) compared with those of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods: In total, 1,376 patients with undifferentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma were included, consisting of 1,002 patients diagnosed with PDAC, 54 with uMAC and 320 with SRC. Clinicopathological factors and survival rates were compared among the three histological types.

Results: Significant differences in the distribution of pathological stages were observed among the groups. Patients with SRC had a significantly better survival rate than those with PDAC or uMAC, in both the all patients including non-curative resected patients and curative-resected groups. In addition, there was significant difference in survival between the PDAC and uMAC groups. Multivariate analysis suggested that age, gender, tumor depth, lymph node metastasis and curability significantly affected survival. Histological type was not an independent prognostic factor. There was no significant difference in the pattern of recurrence among the three groups.

Conclusions: The uMAC and SRC had worse and favorable prognosis compared with PDCA, respectively. However, there were no differences in survival by pathological stage, thus histological type was not an independent predictor of prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival curves of patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC), signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC), or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival curves for patients with MAC, SRC, or PDAC who underwent curative resection.

References

    1. Watanabe H, Jass JR, Sobin LH. Histological typing of esophageal and gastric tumors: WHO international histological classification of tumors. 2. Berlin: Springer; 1990.
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma - 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24. - PubMed
    1. Nakamura K, Sugano H, Takagi K. Carcinoma of the stomach in incipient phase: its histogenesis and histological appearances. Gann. 1968;59:251–258. - PubMed
    1. Sugano H, Nakamura K, Kato Y. Pathological studies of human gastric cancer. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1982;32(Suppl 2):329–347. - PubMed
    1. Fang WL, Wu CW, Lo SS, Chen JH, Hsieh MC, Shen KH, Li AF, Tai LC, Lui WY. Mucin-producing gastric cancer: clinicopathological difference between signet ring cell carcinoma and mucinous carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2009;56:1227–1231. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources