Qualitative evaluation of a community peer support service for people with spinal cord injury

Abstract

Study design: Qualitative study involving individual semistructured in-depth interviews.

Objectives: To evaluate peer support provided in general hospitals for people with spinal cord injuries (SCIs).

Setting: The South West of the United Kingdom.

Methods: Fourteen in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with people with SCI and their close relatives, and with health-care professionals involved in their care. Transcribed interviews were coded inductively and analysed thematically. Themes were patterned around positive and less positive aspects of the experience of the peer support service.

Results: The psychological and emotional support provided by the peer support officer was highly valued by the participants. The peer support officer's direct experience of living with a spinal injury gave credibility to the practical advice, information and signposting provided; as well as to the empathy demonstrated by them during their involvement with people with SCI and their families. Health-care professionals appreciated their unique perspective and considered them as a valuable member of the multidisciplinary team.

Conclusion: Peer support is valued by the people affected by SCI. There is a need to further investigate the key aspects of the service, including the optimal timing for introducing this peer support as well as more formal training of mentors.