Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):7-15.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001023. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records

Affiliations

Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records

Kelly Caine et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess patients' desire for granular level privacy control over which personal health information should be shared, with whom, and for what purpose; and whether these preferences vary based on sensitivity of health information.

Materials and methods: A card task for matching health information with providers, questionnaire, and interview with 30 patients whose health information is stored in an electronic medical record system. Most patients' records contained sensitive health information.

Results: No patients reported that they would prefer to share all information stored in an electronic medical record (EMR) with all potential recipients. Sharing preferences varied by type of information (EMR data element) and recipient (eg, primary care provider), and overall sharing preferences varied by participant. Patients with and without sensitive records preferred less sharing of sensitive versus less-sensitive information.

Discussion: Patients expressed sharing preferences consistent with a desire for granular privacy control over which health information should be shared with whom and expressed differences in sharing preferences for sensitive versus less-sensitive EMR data. The pattern of results may be used by designers to generate privacy-preserving EMR systems including interfaces for patients to express privacy and sharing preferences.

Conclusions: To maintain the level of privacy afforded by medical records and to achieve alignment with patients' preferences, patients should have granular privacy control over information contained in their EMR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage less-sensitive and highly-sensitive items shared with each recipient across all participants. EMR, electronic medical record.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Realizing the Full Potential of Helath Informaiton Technology to Improve Healthcare for Americans: The Path Forward. 2010. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-heal...
    1. Boonstra A, Broekhuis M. Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;20 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrows RC, Clayton PD. Privacy, Confidentiality, and Electronic Medical Records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996;3:139–48 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sparck-Jones K. Privacy: what's different now? Interdiscip Sci Rev 2003;28:287–92
    1. Kuperman GJ. Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:678–82 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types