Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
- PMID: 23184562
- PMCID: PMC3568801
- DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs476
Should we consider off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Abstract
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting should be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery (ONCAB) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization. Eighty-two papers were identified by a systematic search, of which nine were judged to best answer the clinical question. Of these, one was a randomized controlled trial and the remaining eight were retrospective observational studies. The author, journal, date, patient group, country of publication, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses were tabulated. In total, these nine studies included 3001 patients (n = 817 OPCAB, 2184 ONCAB) undergoing emergency revascularization in the setting of ACS. The timing between the onset of ACS and operative intervention ranged from 6 to 72 h. All cases were categorized as urgent/emergent according to the National confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death classification of intervention. Six studies included patients with preoperative cardiogenic shock; however the majority of patients were haemodynamically stable at the time of surgery. Three out of nine studies showed an improvement in 30-day mortality with OPCAB although the remaining six reveal no significant mortality benefit. No difference in long-term mortality was observed between the two techniques. OPCAB was associated with significantly fewer grafts per patient (six studies) and less complete revascularization (two studies). We conclude that whilst OPCAB may have a beneficial effect on 30-day mortality in haemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency revascularization, there is a lack of high-quality data with clearly defined patient demographics. Future studies must ensure adequate preoperative matching between OPCAB and ONCAB groups and clearly categorize haemodynamic status, disease pattern and time to surgery in order to determine the patients in whom OPCAB may confer the greatest benefit.
References
-
- Dunning J, Prendergast B, Mackway-Jones K. Towards evidence-based medicine in cardiothoracic surgery: best BETS. Interactive CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2003;2:405–9. doi:10.1016/S1569-9293(03)00191-9. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Biancari F, Mahar MA, Mosorin M, Heikkinen J, Pokela M, Taskinen P, et al. Immediate and intermediate outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with unstable angina pectoris. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1147–52. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.05.037. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Darwazah AK, Sham'a RA, Isleem I, Hanbali B, Jaber B. Off-pump coronary artery bypass for emergency myocardial revascularization. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2009;17:133–8. - PubMed
-
- Fattouch K, Guccione F, Dioguardi P, Sampognaro R, Corrado E, Caruso M, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:650–6. discussion 656–657 doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.033. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kaya K, Cavolli R, Telli A, Soyal MF, Aslan A, Gokaslan G, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: a clinical analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:31. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-5-31. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
