Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(11):e49682.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049682. Epub 2012 Nov 21.

Stag parties linger: continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline

Affiliations

Stag parties linger: continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline

Lynne A Isbell et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Discussions about the underrepresentation of women in science are challenged by uncertainty over the relative effects of the lack of assertiveness by women and the lack of recognition of them by male colleagues because the two are often indistinguishable. They can be distinguished at professional meetings, however, by comparing symposia, which are largely by invitation, and posters and other talks, which are largely participant-initiated. Analysis of 21 annual meetings of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists reveals that within the subfield of primatology, women give more posters than talks, whereas men give more talks than posters. But most strikingly, among symposia the proportion of female participants differs dramatically by the gender of the organizer. Male-organized symposia have half the number of female first authors (29%) that symposia organized by women (64%) or by both men and women (58%) have, and half that of female participation in talks and posters (65%). We found a similar gender bias from men in symposia from the past 12 annual meetings of the American Society of Primatologists. The bias is surprising given that women are the numerical majority in primatology and have achieved substantial peer recognition in this discipline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Numbers of presentations in primatology by men and women as first authors at AAPA meetings.
Values come from annual meeting issues of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists from 1992–2012. Values above bars are percentages of presentations by women as first authors.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proportion of women as first authors of posters, talks, and symposia at AAPA meetings.
The average proportion for all presentations with women as first authors over a 21-year period of annual meetings of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists is indicated by the solid black line. F-Org. Symp.: symposia organized by women only; F/M Org. Symp.: symposia organized jointly by women and men; M-Org. Symp.: symposia organized by men only.

References

    1. Genoways HH, Freeman PW (2001) Evolution of a scientific meeting: eighty annual meetings of the American Society of Mammalogists, 1919–2000. J Mammal 82: 582–603.
    1. Fedigan LM (1994) Science and the successful female: why there are so many women primatologists. Am Anthropol 86: 529–540.
    1. Turner TR (2002) Changes in biological anthropology: results of the 1998 American Association of Physical Anthropology membership survey. Am J Phys Anthropol 118: 111–116. - PubMed
    1. Addessi E, Borgi M, Palagi E (2012) Is primatology an equal-opportunity discipline? PLoS ONE 7: e30458 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030458. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ley TJ, Hamilton BH (2008) The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science 322: 1472–1474. - PubMed