Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Feb;110(2):152-9.
doi: 10.1038/hdy.2012.78. Epub 2012 Nov 28.

Can resource costs of polyploidy provide an advantage to sex?

Affiliations

Can resource costs of polyploidy provide an advantage to sex?

M Neiman et al. Heredity (Edinb). 2013 Feb.

Abstract

The predominance of sexual reproduction despite its costs indicates that sex provides substantial benefits, which are usually thought to derive from the direct genetic consequences of recombination and syngamy. While genetic benefits of sex are certainly important, sexual and asexual individuals, lineages, or populations may also differ in physiological and life history traits that could influence outcomes of competition between sexuals and asexuals across environmental gradients. Here, we address possible phenotypic costs of a very common correlate of asexuality, polyploidy. We suggest that polyploidy could confer resource costs related to the dietary phosphorus demands of nucleic acid production; such costs could facilitate the persistence of sex in situations where asexual taxa are of higher ploidy level and phosphorus availability limits important traits like growth and reproduction. We outline predictions regarding the distribution of diploid sexual and polyploid asexual taxa across biogeochemical gradients and provide suggestions for study systems and empirical approaches for testing elements of our hypothesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A conceptual model of how nutrient limitation contributes to the maintenance of sex. (a) Variation in bodily P content is due to variation in nucleic acid content (Elser et al., 2003, 2006). (b) High P organisms have higher intrinsic growth rates (Elser et al., 1996, 2003), but may be more susceptible to P limitation (Sterner and Elser, 2002). (c) Taxa with higher ploidy have higher per-cell nucleic acid content; they may also have higher nucleic acid content per unit mass. (d) If taxa with higher ploidy have higher bodily nucleic acid content, they should also have higher bodily P content. (e) and (f) If (b) and (d) are true, success of asexual polyploids will vary more with environmental P availability than will the success of sexual diploids. This greater sensitivity to P availability may be sufficient on its own to maintain sex when P availability is low (e), or it may simply reduce the competitive advantage of asexuals (f).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams J, Hansche PE. Population studies in microorganisms I. Evolution of diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1974;76:327–338. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams KL. Evolution of duplicate gene expression in polyploid and hybrid plants. J Hered. 2007;98:136–141. - PubMed
    1. Adams KL, Wendel JF. Novel patterns of gene expression in polyploid plants. Trends Genet. 2005;21:539–543. - PubMed
    1. Adolfsson S, Michalakis Y, Paczesniak D, Bode SNS, Butlin RK, Lamatsch DK, et al. Evaluation of elevated ploidy and asexual reproduction as alternative explanations for geographic parthenogenesis in Eucypris virens ostracods. Evolution. 2010;64:986–997. - PubMed
    1. Albertin W, Marullo P. Polyploidy in fungi: evolution after whole-genome duplication. Proc Roy Soc Lond B. 2012;279:2497–2509. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types