Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Apr;20(2):191-207.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0347-2.

Processing convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour: figure-ground, structural shape, and attention

Affiliations
Review

Processing convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour: figure-ground, structural shape, and attention

Marco Bertamini et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Interest in convexity has a long history in vision science. For smooth contours in an image, it is possible to code regions of positive (convex) and negative (concave) curvature, and this provides useful information about solid shape. We review a large body of evidence on the role of this information in perception of shape and in attention. This includes evidence from behavioral, neurophysiological, imaging, and developmental studies. A review is necessary to analyze the evidence on how convexity affects (1) separation between figure and ground, (2) part structure, and (3) attention allocation. Despite some broad agreement on the importance of convexity in these areas, there is a lack of consensus on the interpretation of specific claims--for example, on the contribution of convexity to metric depth and on the automatic directing of attention to convexities or to concavities. The focus is on convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour, not convexity and concavity in 3-D, but the important link between the two is discussed. We conclude that there is good evidence for the role of convexity information in figure-ground organization and in parsing, but other, more specific claims are not (yet) well supported.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Vis. 2009 Sep 10;9(10):8.1-13 - PubMed
    1. Perception. 2001;30(11):1285-94 - PubMed
    1. Perception. 1985;14(3):367-70 - PubMed
    1. Cogn Neurosci. 2013;4(1):31-45 - PubMed
    1. Perception. 2006;35(12):1679-92 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources