Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep;3(3):261-6.
doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.102602.

Morphometric analysis of posterior fossa and foramen magnum

Gautam Kanodia  1 , Vijay Parihar, Yad R Yadav, Pushp R Bhatele, Dhananjay Sharma
Affiliations

Morphometric analysis of posterior fossa and foramen magnum

Gautam Kanodia et al. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Configuration and size of the foramen magnum and posterior fossa plays an important role in the pathophysiology of the posterior fossa and craniovertebral junction disorders. This study is aimed to find out various dimensions of the foramen magnum and posterior fossa.

Materials and methods: This is a prospective study of 100 consecutive normal computerized tomography (CT) scans of posterior fossa and 100 dry adult skulls without any bony abnormality. The posterior fossa volume was calculated by abc/2 in method 1 and by advanced work station of CT scan in method 2. Various dimensions of posterior fossa and foramen magnum were also studied.

Results: Age ranged from 16 to 89 years with a mean of 51.3 years. Mean height of posterior fossa were 3.01 cm (±0.22) and 3.52 (±0.43) cm in dry skull and CT scan group, respectively (P < 0.0001). Mean volume of posterior fossa were 157.88 (±27.94) cm(3) and 159.58 (±25.73) cm(3) by method 1 and method 2, respectively (P > 0.05). All the dimensions of posterior fossa and foramen magnum were larger in male as compared to female. Mean anteroposterior (AP), transverse diameter and surface area of the foramen magnum were 3.31 (±0.35) cm, 2.76 (±0.31) cm, and 729.15 (±124.87) mm(2), respectively, in CT scan group as compared to 3.41 (±0.29) cm, 2.75 (±0.25) cm, and 747.67 (±108.60) mm(2), respectively, in dry skull group.

Conclusion: Normal values of posterior fossa and foramen magnum could serve as a future reference. Dry skull dimensions could be different from CT scan measurement. More studies are needed as there could be variations in dimensions in different regions in India.

Keywords: Foramen magnum; posterior cranial fossa; skull.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Height of posterior fossa
Graph 1
Graph 1
Dimensions of posterior fossa and foramen magnum in head injury patients in different genders
Graph 2
Graph 2
Posterior fossa volume by methods 1 and 2 in male and female head injury patients
Graph 3
Graph 3
Surface area of foramen magnum in male and female head injury patients
Graph 4
Graph 4
Posterior fossa height, AP, and transverse diameters of foramen magnum in head injury patients and dry skull
Graph 5
Graph 5
Surface area of foramen magnum in head injury patients and dry skull
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bagley CA, Pindrik JA, Bookland MJ, Camara-Quintana JQ, Carson BS. Cervicomedullary decompression for foramen magnum stenosis in achondroplasia. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(3 Suppl):166–72. - PubMed
    1. Dickman C, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VK. Surgery of the craniovertebral junction. 1st ed. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1998.
    1. Wang H, Rosenbaum AE, Reid CS, Zinreich SJ, Pyeritz RE. Pediatric patients with achondroplasia: CT evaluation of the craniocervical junction. Radiology. 1987;164:515–9. - PubMed
    1. Sherekar SK, Yadav YR, Basoor AS, Baghel A, Adam N. Clinical implications of alignment of upper and lower cervical spine. Neurol India. 2006;54:264–7. - PubMed
    1. Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP, Barsan WG, Sauerbeck LR, Zuccarello M, et al. The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke. 1996;27:1304–5. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources