Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;109(44):746-52.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0746. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

Smoking prevention in school students: positive effects of a hospital-based intervention

Affiliations

Smoking prevention in school students: positive effects of a hospital-based intervention

Sabine Stamm-Balderjahn et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Adolescents have smoked less in recent years, but 11.7% of 12-to-17-year-olds were still smokers in 2011. The prevalence of smoking has also remained high among 18-to-25-year-olds (36.8%). An intervention program called "Students in the Hospital" was developed in which the health aspects of smoking and its individual and societal consequences were presented in an interactive informational event. In this study, we determine the efficacy of the program.

Methods: From September 2007 to July 2008, we performed an anonymous survey by questionnaire, with a quasi-experimental control-group design, two weeks before (t(1)) and six months after (t(2)) the intervention in a group of 760 participating school students in Berlin.

Results: 40.8% of the participants were smokers, among whom 79% stated that they smoked water pipe. Significantly fewer students in the intervention group than in the control group began smoking in the six months after the intervention (p<0.001). The chance of remaining a non-smoker was four times as high in the intervention group (OR, 4.14; CI, 1.66-10.36). Girls benefited from the intervention more than boys (OR 2.56, CI 1.06-6.19). 16.1% of smokers in the intervention group and 17.6% in the control group gave up smoking (p>0.05).

Conclusion: A clear primary preventive effect of the program was demonstrated, although it apparently did not induce persons who were already smokers to quit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the study participants
Figure 2
Figure 2
Smoking behavior of the cigarette smokers (n = 192) and water pipe smokers (n = 245) NB: Annual cigarette consumption was not recorded
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in smoking status in both study groups between baseline and the end of the observation period (a = intervention group, b = control group)

Comment in

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240687813_eng.pdf. 2011 (last accessed on 17.08.2012)
    1. Mons U. Tabakattributable Mortalität in Deutschland und in den deutschen Bundesländern - Berechnungen mit Daten des Mikrozensus und der Todesursachenstatistik. Gesundheitswesen. 2011;73:238–246. - PubMed
    1. Lampert T Robert Koch-Institut Berlin (eds.) Rauchen - Aktuelle Entwicklungen bei Erwachsenen GBE kompakt 2(4) www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Gesundheitsberichterstattung.... 2011 (last accessed on 23.08.12)
    1. Haustein K-O, Groneberg D. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. Tobacco or Health? Physiological and Social Damages Caused by Tobacco Smoking.
    1. Lampert T. Smoking, physical inactivity, and obesity: associations with social status. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(1-2):1–7. - PMC - PubMed