Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Nov 29:13:229.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-229.

Eight-step method to build the clinical content of an evidence-based care pathway: the case for COPD exacerbation

Cathy Lodewijckx  1 , Marc Decramer, Walter Sermeus, Massimiliano Panella, Svin Deneckere, Kris Vanhaecht
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Eight-step method to build the clinical content of an evidence-based care pathway: the case for COPD exacerbation

Cathy Lodewijckx et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Optimization of the clinical care process by integration of evidence-based knowledge is one of the active components in care pathways. When studying the impact of a care pathway by using a cluster-randomized design, standardization of the care pathway intervention is crucial. This methodology paper describes the development of the clinical content of an evidence-based care pathway for in-hospital management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation in the context of a cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) on care pathway effectiveness.

Methods: The clinical content of a care pathway for COPD exacerbation was developed based on recognized process design and guideline development methods. Subsequently, based on the COPD case study, a generalized eight-step method was designed to support the development of the clinical content of an evidence-based care pathway.

Results: A set of 38 evidence-based key interventions and a set of 24 process and 15 outcome indicators were developed in eight different steps. Nine Belgian multidisciplinary teams piloted both the set of key interventions and indicators. The key intervention set was judged by the teams as being valid and clinically applicable. In addition, the pilot study showed that the indicators were feasible for the involved clinicians and patients.

Conclusions: The set of 38 key interventions and the set of process and outcome indicators were found to be appropriate for the development and standardization of the clinical content of the COPD care pathway in the context of a cRCT on pathway effectiveness. The developed eight-step method may facilitate multidisciplinary teams caring for other patient populations in designing the clinical content of their future care pathways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Eight-step method for development of the clinical content of an evidence based care pathway: the case for COPD exacerbation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Literature search strategy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of detailed description of a key intervention: arterial blood gas measurement.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington: National Academy Press; 2000. Creating safety systems in health care organisations; pp. 155–201.
    1. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–1230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004;180:S57–S60. - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington, DC 20418: National Academy Press; 2001. Applying evidence to health care delivery; pp. 145–163.
    1. Lodewijckx C, Sermeus W, Vanhaecht K, Panella M, Deneckere S, Leigheb F, Decramer M. Inhospital management of COPD exacerbations: a systematic review of the literature with regard to adherence to international guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:1101–1110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01305.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources