Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Dec;89(12):1708-14.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182775c8c.

Comparison of topcon optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of topcon optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry

Luke Cameron Northey et al. Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To establish within-rater repeatability and minimum measurements required for reliable assessment of central corneal thickness (CCT) using Topcon three-dimensional OCT-2000 (Topcon Medical Systems, Oakland, NJ) Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) and to test agreement against ultrasound pachymetry (USP).

Methods: Twenty participants underwent five scans using FD-OCT followed by five CCT measurements using USP. Each FD-OCT scan produced 12 meridional optical sections, giving 60 sections in total. The FD-OCT CCT was calculated from each section using Topcon FastMap software. Within-rater repeatability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), within-subject variance (Sw), and within-subject coefficients of repeatability (COR) and variation (COV). Agreement was assessed using analysis of variance, simple linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and ICC. The minimum number of FD-OCT scans required to achieve a mean CCT within the 99% confidence intervals of all 60 measurements was calculated.

Results: Mean CCTs were 528 ± 27 μm (FD-OCT) and 544 ± 29 μm (USP). The FD-OCT within-rater repeatability values assessed using ICC, Sw, COR, and COV were 0.99, 5.07 μm, 14.07 μm, and 0.01%, respectively. The USP within-rater repeatability values assessed using ICC, Sw, COR, and COV were 0.96, 5.49 μm, 15.22 μm, and 0.01%, respectively. Both instruments were similarly correlated (p < 0.05), with FD-OCT underestimating CCT by 16.08 μm relative to USP. Four FD-OCT scans were required to achieve a mean within the 99% confidence interval of all measurements for each participant.

Conclusions: Both instruments displayed high repeatability, with strong agreement between devices, although FD-OCT significantly underestimated CCT compared with USP. The FD-OCT agreement with USP remained strong when only four scans were analyzed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources