Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2012 Dec;130(6):1187-1196.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9c3c.

"SIEF"--simultaneous implant exchange with fat: a new option in revision breast implant surgery

Affiliations
Case Reports

"SIEF"--simultaneous implant exchange with fat: a new option in revision breast implant surgery

Daniel A Del Vecchio. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

A technique of implant exchange is reported using recipient-site preexpansion followed by autologous fat transplantation to the breast in 12 consecutive patients with breast implants who desired implant removal. Recipient-site preexpansion, used 2 weeks before fat grafting, may have both practical and theoretical benefits in increasing the breast subcutaneous space and stimulating the recipient-site microcellular environment overlying the prosthetic implant, allowing the subcutaneous insertion of a sufficient core volume of donor graft at the time of prosthetic explantation. In the cases described, the postexplantation breast volume at 9 months to 1 year postoperatively by quantitative three-dimensional imaging was equal to or greater than the preexplantation composite volume of breast and implant. Preexpansion before implant exchange with fat affords a more abundant space, completely independent from the subglandular or submuscular planes. In this new space, the "third space" of the breast, it is possible to technically place graft into the breast subcutaneous tissue and alleviate breast asymmetry resulting from pocket distortions caused by capsular contracture or by implant pocket drift. Observing breast augmentation with implants and with fat grafting in the same patient affords a unique opportunity to analyze some of the key differences between the two techniques. Recipient-site preexpansion and simultaneous implant exchange with fat (SIEF) should be added to the list of applications where fat grafting to the breasts may have early clinical utility and portends the use of fat used in conjunction with breast implants to achieve better patient outcomes.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, V.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Del Vecchio D. Breast reconstruction for breast asymmetry using recipient site pre-expansion and autologous fat grafting: A case report. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:523–527.
    1. Khouri R, Del Vecchio D. Breast reconstruction and augmentation using pre-expansion and autologous fat transplantation. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:269–280.
    1. Tebbetts JB, Teitelbaum S. High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: Potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2150–2159.
    1. Yoshimura K, Asano Y, Aoi N, et al.. Progenitor-enriched adipose tissue transplantation as rescue for breast implant complications. Breast J. 2010;16:169–175.
    1. Saxena V, Orgill D, Kohane I. A set of genes previously implicated in the hypoxia response might be an important modulator in the rat ear tissue response to mechanical stretch. BMC Genomics 2007;23:430.

Substances