The Barretos short instrument for assessment of quality of life (BSIqol): development and preliminary validation in a cohort of cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment
- PMID: 23192011
- PMCID: PMC3541104
- DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-144
The Barretos short instrument for assessment of quality of life (BSIqol): development and preliminary validation in a cohort of cancer patients undergoing antineoplastic treatment
Abstract
Background: To be clinically useful, an instrument assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) should be easy to understand and quick to answer. Few instruments have been designed to be short, simple, and easily understandable by patients from all educational levels. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a brief general instrument developed to assess HRQOL.
Methods: Results from a preliminary study regarding the initial development of the Barretos Short Instrument for Assessment of Quality of Life (BSIqol) with 80 cancer patients are presented. Out of all the patients, 59 completed the BSIqol on two occasions in order to evaluate the reproducibility test-retest. Validity analyses were done comparing scores from BSIqol with EORTC QLQ-C30 and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). In addition, BSIqol scores were analyzed in function of ECOG-PS, work activity, and financial income.
Results: BSIqol demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.79) and adequate test-retest reliability, with intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) varying from 0.736 to 0.946. There were adequate correlations between scores of BSIqol, EORTC QLQ-C30 and ESAS. The BSIqol was capable of discriminating between clinical subgroups, with different ECOG-PS and work activity. Patients completed the BSIqol in a median time <2 min. Only one patient reported some difficulty to answer the instrument.
Conclusions: BSIqol seems to be a straightforward and useful instrument for rapidly assessing HRQOL from cancer patients. Further studies are necessary to evaluate BSIqol in different populations and also to assess its responsiveness and define its minimal clinically important differences.
Similar articles
-
Further evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 psychometric properties in a large Brazilian cancer patient cohort as a function of their educational status.Support Care Cancer. 2014 Aug;22(8):2151-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2206-3. Epub 2014 Mar 21. Support Care Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24652051
-
Psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Uganda.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01769-x. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021. PMID: 33892718 Free PMC article.
-
The Brazilian Version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) Is a Feasible, Valid and Reliable Instrument for the Measurement of Symptoms in Advanced Cancer Patients.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0132073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132073. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26154288 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric validation of the Moroccan version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in colorectal Cancer patients: cross-sectional study and systematic literature review.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07793-w. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33499819 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of life of Brazilian and Spanish cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: an integrative literature review.Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016;24:e2688. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.0564.2688. Epub 2016 May 17. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016. PMID: 27192414 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC. et al.The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–376. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J. et al.The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:570–579. - PubMed
-
- Luckett T, King MT, Butow PN, Oguchi M, Rankin N, Price MA, Hackl NA, Heading G. Choosing between the EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G for measuring health-related quality of life in cancer clinical research: issues, evidence and recommendations. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:2179–2190. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq721. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources