Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 Dec;5(6):821-30.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.968321. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

A randomized, controlled pilot study of autologous CD34+ cell therapy for critical limb ischemia

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A randomized, controlled pilot study of autologous CD34+ cell therapy for critical limb ischemia

Douglas W Losordo et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Critical limb ischemia portends a risk of major amputation of 25% to 35% within 1 year of diagnosis. Preclinical studies provide evidence that intramuscular injection of autologous CD34+ cells improves limb perfusion and reduces amputation risk. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of intramuscular injections of autologous CD34+ cells in subjects with moderate or high-risk critical limb ischemia, who were poor or noncandidates for surgical or percutaneous revascularization (ACT34-CLI).

Methods and results: Twenty-eight critical limb ischemia subjects were randomized and treated: 7 to 1 × 10(5) (low-dose) and 9 to 1 × 10(6) (high-dose) autologous CD34+ cells/kg; and 12 to placebo (control). Intramuscular injections were distributed into 8 sites within the ischemic lower extremity. At 6 months postinjection, 67% of control subjects experienced a major or minor amputation versus 43% of low-dose and 22% of high-dose cell-treated subjects (P=0.137). This trend continued at 12 months, with 75% of control subjects experiencing any amputation versus 43% of low-dose and 22% of high-dose cell-treated subjects (P=0.058). Amputation incidence was lower in the combined cell-treated groups compared with control group (6 months: P=0.125; 12 months: P=0.054), with the low-dose and high-dose groups individually showing trends toward improved amputation-free survival at 6 months and 12 months. No adverse safety signal was associated with cell administration.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence that intramuscular administration of autologous CD34+ cells was safe in this patient population. Favorable trends toward reduced amputation rates in cell-treated versus control subjects were observed. These findings warrant further exploration in later-phase clinical trials.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00616980.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study Design and Subject Disposition
Figure 2
Figure 2. Probability of Amputation Free Survival
Probability of amputation free survival in low-dose, high-dose and control groups (A) and in combined cell-treated and control groups (B). Probability of major amputation free survival in low-dose, high-dose and control groups (C) and in combined cell-treated and control groups (D).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Functional Improvement and Wound Healing at 6 and 12 Months
3A: Total distance walked on 6 minute walk test at baseline and 6 and 12 months post-injection in subjects that completed the test at 6 and/or 12 months post-injection. 3B: Total wound area in the treated leg in subjects with ulcers reported at 6 and/or 12 months post-injection. Zero (0) indicates no leg ulcer present. C=control, L=low-dose, H=high-dose, WD=withdrawal, A=amputation, M=missing.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Summary of Mean Change from Baseline in SF-36 Health Domains
Mean (±SD) change from baseline in SF-36 health domains at 6 months and 12 months post-injection. PF=physical functioning, RP=role physical, BP=bodily pain, GH=general health, V=vitality, SF=social functioning, RE=role emotional, MH=mental health, HT=health transition.

References

    1. Criqui MH, Fronek A, Barrett-Connor E, Klauber MR, Gabriel S, Goodman D. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in a defined population. Circulation. 1985;71:510–515. - PubMed
    1. Second European Consensus Document on chronic critical leg ischemia. Circulation. 1991;84:IV1–26. - PubMed
    1. Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) TASC Working Group. TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:S1–S296. - PubMed
    1. Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillepsie I, Ruckley CV, Raab G, Storkey H. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1925–1934. - PubMed
    1. Kalka C, Masuda H, Takahashi T, Kalka-Moll WM, Silver M, Kearney M, Li T, Isner JM, Asahara T. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:3422–3427. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data