Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;80(1):47-56.
doi: 10.1111/cen.12119. Epub 2013 May 6.

Current level of glycaemic control and its associated factors in patients with type 2 diabetes across Europe: data from the PANORAMA study

Affiliations

Current level of glycaemic control and its associated factors in patients with type 2 diabetes across Europe: data from the PANORAMA study

Pedro de Pablos-Velasco et al. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To provide an update on glycaemic control in European patients with type 2 diabetes based on data from the nine-country, cross-sectional PANORAMA study (NCT00916513).

Design: Post-hoc analysis to report the number of patients achieving/not achieving glycaemic goal (HbA(1c) <7%).

Patients: Patients were randomly or consecutively selected from physician practices in nine countries. Eligible patients were aged ≥40 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes >1 year prior to study entry, and had an available medical record of >1 year.

Measurements: All data were collected at a single visit, including HbA1c measurement using a common device (A1CNow). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to investigate factors associated with not reaching glycaemic goal.

Results: Of 5817 patients enrolled (aged 65·9 ± 10·4 years, 53·7% male), 37·4% had an HbA(1c) ≥7%; (range 25·9% in The Netherlands to 52·0% in Turkey). In adjusted multivariate analyses, higher individual glycaemic target, younger age, poor physician-reported patient adherence to lifestyle/medication, longer diabetes duration, increasing treatment regimen complexity and physician-reported patient's unwillingness to intensify treatment were associated with not achieving goal. However, bivariate analyses also found gender, socioeconomic factors, body mass index, rate of complications and hypoglycaemia to be associated with not achieving goal.

Conclusions: In PANORAMA, 37·4% of patients enrolled were not at glycaemic goal. Factors relating to patient characteristics, physician selection of individualized HbA1c target and diabetes itself (longer duration, more complex treatment) were strongly associated with not achieving goal. Further studies are warranted to explore these associations and evaluate strategies for improving glycaemic control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Associated data