Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun;2(1):010403.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.02.010403.

Setting research priorities to reduce global mortality from preterm birth and low birth weight by 2015

Affiliations

Setting research priorities to reduce global mortality from preterm birth and low birth weight by 2015

Rajiv Bahl et al. J Glob Health. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: This paper aims to identify health research priorities that could improve the rate of progress in reducing global neonatal mortality from preterm birth and low birth weight (PB/LBW), as set out in the UN's Millennium Development Goal 4.

Methods: We applied the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) methodology for setting priorities in health research investments. In the process coordinated by the World Health Organization in 2007-2008, 21 researchers with interest in child, maternal and newborn health suggested 82 research ideas that spanned across the broad spectrum of epidemiological research, health policy and systems research, improvement of existing interventions and development of new interventions. The 82 research questions were then assessed for answerability, effectiveness, deliverability, maximum potential for mortality reduction and the effect on equity using the CHNRI method.

Results: The top 10 identified research priorities were dominated by health systems and policy research questions (eg, identification of LBW infants born at home within 24-48 hours of birth for additional care; approaches to improve quality of care of LBW infants in health facilities; identification of barriers to optimal home care practices including care seeking; and approaches to increase the use of antenatal corticosteriods in preterm labor and to improve access to hospital care for LBW infants). These were followed by priorities for improvement of the existing interventions (eg, early initiation of breastfeeding, including feeding mode and techniques for those unable to suckle directly from the breast; improved cord care, such as chlorhexidine application; and alternative methods to Kangaroo Mother Care (KMC) to keep LBW infants warm in community settings). The highest-ranked epidemiological question suggested improving criteria for identifying LBW infants who need to be cared for in a hospital. Among the new interventions, the greatest support was shown for the development of new simple and effective interventions for providing thermal care to LBW infants, if KMC is not acceptable to the mother.

Conclusion: The context for this exercise was set within the MDG4, requiring an urgent and rapid progress in mortality reduction from low birth weight, rather than identifying long-term strategic solutions of the greatest potential. In a short-term context, the health policy and systems research to improve access and coverage by the existing interventions, coupled with further research to improve effectiveness, deliverability and acceptance of existing interventions, and epidemiological research to address the key gaps in knowledge, were all highlighted as research priorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CHNRI’s conceptual framework showing key steps required to get from investments in health research options to decrease in burden of death, disease or disability. The framework identifies criteria to discriminate between likelihoods of success of competing research options: (i) answerability; (ii) effectiveness; (iii) deliverability; (iv) maximum potential for disease burden reduction; and (v) predicted impact on equity in the population (right side). These criteria are not necessarily what drives investment decisions in health research today (left side) [6-8].

References

    1. Bryce J, Terreri N, Victora CG, Mason E, Daelmans B, Bhutta ZA, et al. Countdown to 2015: tracking intervention coverage for child survival. Lancet. 2006;368:1067–76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69339-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray CJ, Laakso T, Shibuya K, Hill K, Lopez AD. Can we achieve Millennium Development Goal 4? New analysis of country trends and forecasts of under-5 mortality to 2015. Lancet. 2007;370:1040–54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61478-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bryce J, El Arifeen S, Pariyo G, Lanata C, Gwatkin D, Habicht JP, Multi-Country Evaluation of IMCI Study Group Reducing child mortality: can public health deliver? Lancet. 2003;362:159–64. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13870-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. World Health Report 2012: No health without research. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012.
    1. Pang T, Terry RF, The PLoS Medicine Editors WHO/PLoS Collection “No Health Without Research”: A call for papers. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001008. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources