Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Nov;12(4):273-8.
doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2012.2454.

A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements

Mediha Selimović-Dragaš et al. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

To evaluate cytotoxicity of experimental conventional and resin modified glass-ionomer cements on UMR-106 osteoblast cell cultures and cell cultures of NIH(3)T(3) mouse fibroblasts specimens were prepared for every experimental material and divided into: group 1.Conventional glass-ionomer cements: GC Fuji IX GP Fast, GC Fuji Triage and Ketac Silver; group 2. Resin modified glass-ionomer cements: GC Fuji II LC, GC Fuji Plus and Vitrebond; group 3. Positive control was presented by specimens of composite Vit-l-ecence® and negative control-group 4. was presented by α-minimum essential medium for UMR-106 - osteoblast-like cells and Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium for NIH(3)T(3) mouse fibroblast cells. Both cell cultures were exposed to 10% of eluate of each single specimen of each experimental material. Experimental dishes were incubated for 24 h. Cell metabolism was evaluated using methyltetrazolium assay. Kruskal-Wallis test and Tukey-Kramer post hoc test for the materials evaluated on NIH(3)T(3) mouse fibroblast cells, as well as UMR-106 osteoblast-like cells showed significantly more cytotoxicity of RMGICs, predominantly Vitrebond to both GICs and composite- Vit-l-ecence®.The lowest influence on cell's metabolism on UMR-106 osteoblas-like cells was shown by Ketac Silver and the lowest influence on cell's metabolism on NIH(3)T(3) mouse fibroblast cells was shown by Fuji IX GP Fast. Statistical evaluation of sensitivity of cell lines UMR-106 osteoblast-like cells and NIH(3)T(3) mouse fibroblast cells, using Mann-Whitney test, showed that NIH(3)T(3) mouse fibroblast cells were more sensitive for the evaluation of cytotoxicity of dental materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Selimovic-Dragas M, Juric H. Glass-ionomer cements [Glas jonomer cementi] In: Vulicevic ZR, editor. Materials for clinical application in children's dentistry. [Klinicka primena materijala u decjoj stomatologiji] Beograd: Beobook; 2010. pp. 73–114.
    1. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G, Ekstrand J. Glass ionomer materials as a rechargeable fluoride system. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1997;7(2):65–73. - PubMed
    1. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Suljak PJ, Koch G. Reminaralization of natural carious lesions with glass ionomer cement. Swed Dent J. 1997;21(1-2):11–17. - PubMed
    1. Stanislawski L, Daniau X, Lautiè A, Goldberg M. Factors Responsible for Pulp Cell Cytotoxicity Induced by Resin-Modified glass Ionomer Cements. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 1999;48:277–88. - PubMed
    1. Costa CAS, Hebling J, Garcia-Godoy F, Thomas Hanks C. In vitro cytotoxicity of five glass-ionomer cements. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3853–3858. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances