Validity of pedometers in people with physical disabilities: a systematic review
- PMID: 23201318
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.030
Validity of pedometers in people with physical disabilities: a systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To review the literature for the criterion validity of pedometers for use in child and adult populations with physical disabilities.
Data sources: Academic Search Premier, ERIC, SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, AMED, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases, searched from inception to September 7, 2011.
Study selection: Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed articles, included populations with physical disabilities, and reported primary data for pedometer validity in comparison with direct observation. A consensus approach was used to apply the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 163 articles identified in the database searches (excluding duplicates), 7 studies met the inclusion criteria.
Data extraction: The quality of the studies was assessed independently by 2 reviewers, using a purpose-designed appraisal tool, with a consensus approach used to settle disagreement. A single reviewer extracted data relating to sample size, participant characteristics, pedometer model, main variables tested, duration of tests, and method of direct observation.
Data synthesis: The methodologic quality of the studies was generally high; however, there was a wide variation of population and methodology between studies. The correlation between pedometer step counts and directly observed step counts was moderate to excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, .52-.87), and percent errors ranged from 0.5% to 24.7%. Secondary variables reported included the effect of speed of movement, pedometer placement, comparison of pedometer makes/models, and test-retest reliability.
Conclusions: Available evidence suggests that pedometers are valid for use in clinical and research settings in people with physical disabilities. Further research examining the validity of pedometers in less heterogeneous populations of people with disabilities is warranted to determine validity for specific disability populations and to determine optimal pedometer placement.
Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Measuring activity levels of young people: the validity of pedometers.Br Med Bull. 2010;95:121-37. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldq016. Epub 2010 Jun 18. Br Med Bull. 2010. PMID: 20562207 Review.
-
Evaluation of a commercially available pedometer used to promote physical activity as part of a national programme.Br J Sports Med. 2010 Dec;44(16):1178-83. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.061085. Epub 2009 May 26. Br J Sports Med. 2010. PMID: 19474004
-
Pedometer accuracy in physical activity assessment of preschool children.J Sci Med Sport. 2007 Oct;10(5):303-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.07.004. Epub 2006 Sep 5. J Sci Med Sport. 2007. PMID: 16911872
-
Why do pedometers work?: a reflection upon the factors related to successfully increasing physical activity.Sports Med. 2009;39(12):981-93. doi: 10.2165/11319600-000000000-00000. Sports Med. 2009. PMID: 19902981
-
Validity of Submaximal Step Tests to Estimate Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Healthy Adults.Sports Med. 2016 May;46(5):737-50. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0445-1. Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 26670455 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of an Inexpensive Harnessing System Allowing Independent Gardening for Balance Training for Mobility Impaired Individuals.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 20;21(16):5610. doi: 10.3390/s21165610. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34451053 Free PMC article.
-
A guide to consumer-grade wearables in cardiovascular clinical care and population health for non-experts.NPJ Cardiovasc Health. 2025;2(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s44325-025-00082-6. Epub 2025 Sep 2. NPJ Cardiovasc Health. 2025. PMID: 40909206 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcome Measures of Free-Living Activity in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2019 Sep;7(3):284-289. doi: 10.1007/s40141-019-00228-5. Epub 2019 May 28. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2019. PMID: 31406630 Free PMC article.
-
Objective Measurement of Walking Activity Using Wearable Technologies in People with Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review Protocol.Biomed Hub. 2021 Jul 13;6(2):64-68. doi: 10.1159/000516819. eCollection 2021 May-Aug. Biomed Hub. 2021. PMID: 34616747 Free PMC article.
-
Keeping Pace with Wearables: A Living Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating the Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Technologies in Health Measurement.Sports Med. 2024 Nov;54(11):2907-2926. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02077-2. Epub 2024 Jul 30. Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 39080098 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous