Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar:51:78-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

Effects of mobile Internet use on college student pedestrian injury risk

Katherine W Byington  1 , David C Schwebel
Affiliations

Effects of mobile Internet use on college student pedestrian injury risk

Katherine W Byington et al. Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: College-age individuals have the highest incidence of pedestrian injuries of any age cohort. One factor that might contribute to elevated pedestrian injuries among this age group is injuries incurred while crossing streets distracted by mobile devices.

Objectives: Examine whether young adult pedestrian safety is compromised while crossing a virtual pedestrian street while distracted using the Internet on a mobile "smartphone."

Method: A within-subjects design was implemented with 92 young adults. Participants crossed a virtual pedestrian street 20 times, half the time while undistracted and half while completing an email-driven "scavenger hunt" to answer mundane questions using mobile Internet on their cell phones. Six measures of pedestrian behavior were assessed during crossings. Participants also reported typical patterns of street crossing and mobile Internet use.

Results: Participants reported using mobile Internet with great frequency in daily life, including while walking across streets. In the virtual street environment, pedestrian behavior was greatly altered and generally more risky when participants were distracted by Internet use. While distracted, participants waited longer to cross the street (F=42.37), missed more safe opportunities to cross (F=42.63), took longer to initiate crossing when a safe gap was available (F=53.03), looked left and right less often (F=124.68), spent more time looking away from the road (F=1959.78), and were more likely to be hit or almost hit by an oncoming vehicle (F=29.54; all ps<0.01). Results were retained after controlling for randomized order; participant gender, age, and ethnicity; and both pedestrian habits and mobile Internet experience.

Conclusion: Pedestrian behavior was influenced, and generally considerably riskier, when participants were simultaneously using mobile Internet and crossing the street than when crossing the street with no distraction. This finding reinforces the need for increased awareness concerning the risks of distracted pedestrian behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screen shot of the virtual pedestrian environment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Atkins RM, Turner WH, Duthie RB, Wilde BR. Injuries to pedestrians in road traffic accidents. BMJ. 1988;297:1431–1434. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bungum TJ, Day C, Henry LJ. The association of distraction and caution displayed by pedestrians at a lighted crosswalk. Journal of Community Health. 2005;30:269–279. - PubMed
    1. Drews FA, Yazdani H, Godfrey CN, Cooper JM, Strayer DL. Text messaging during simulated driving. Human Factors. 2009;51:762–770. - PubMed
    1. Ewing R, Durnbaugh E. The built environment and traffic safety: A review of empirical evidence. Journal of Planning Literature. 2009;23:347–367.
    1. Hatfield J, Murphy S. The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behavior at signalized and unsignalised intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 2007;39:197–205. - PubMed

Publication types