Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;30(4):811-23.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss222. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster

Affiliations

Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster

Jose L Campos et al. Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Codon usage bias (CUB) in Drosophila is higher for X-linked genes than for autosomal genes. One possible explanation is that the higher effective recombination rate for genes on the X chromosome compared with the autosomes reduces their susceptibility to Hill-Robertson effects, and thus enhances the efficacy of selection on codon usage. The genome sequence of D. melanogaster was used to test this hypothesis. Contrary to expectation, it was found that, after correcting for the effective recombination rate, CUB remained higher on the X than on the autosomes. In contrast, an analysis of polymorphism data from a Rwandan population showed that mean nucleotide site diversity at 4-fold degenerate sites for genes on the X is approximately three-quarters of the autosomal value after correcting for the effective recombination rate, compared with approximate equality before correction. In addition, these data show that selection for preferred versus unpreferred synonymous variants is stronger on the X than the autosomes, which accounts for the higher CUB of genes on the X chromosome. This difference in the strength of selection does not appear to reflect the effects of dominance of mutations affecting codon usage, differences in gene expression levels between X and autosomes, or differences in mutational bias. Its cause therefore remains unexplained. The stronger selection on CUB on the X chromosome leads to a lower rate of synonymous site divergence compared with the autosomes; this will cause a stronger upward bias for X than A in estimates of the proportion of nonsynonymous mutations fixed by positive selection, for methods based on the McDonald-Kreitman test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

F<sc>ig</sc>. 1.
Fig. 1.
Pairwise relationships between several genomic variables. The variables considered are CUB (Fop), effective recombination rate (Rec), CDS length, overall gene expression, and GC content in short introns (GCI). The relationships between these variables are investigated in four different data sets: oA, autosomal genes in the overlap region; oX, X-linked genes in the overlap region; A, autosomal genes in the full data set which spans the full range of effective recombination rates; and X, X-linked genes in the full data set. We plot the Loess regression lines for each data set and pairwise comparison. We show the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients and their significance (***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05).
F<sc>ig</sc>. 2.
Fig. 2.
Effective recombination rate versus 4-fold synonymous diversity (π4) for the autosomes and 4-fold synonymous diversity multiplied by 4/3 (π4 corrected) for the X chromosome. Bold lines represent Loess regression lines, in green for the autosomal genes and in red for the X chromosome genes. Dashed lines represent the CIs for the lines. The two vertical lines indicate the lower and upper ends of the overlap region.
F<sc>ig</sc><sc>.</sc> 3.
Fig. 3.
Frequency spectra at polymorphic synonymous sites for the overlap regions of the X chromosome (oX) and the autosomes (oA).

References

    1. Andolfatto P. Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18:279–290. - PubMed
    1. Ashburner M, Hawley S, Golic K. Drosophila: a laboratory handbook. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor (NY): Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2005.
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B. 1995;57:289–300.
    1. Bulmer M. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics. 1991;129:897–907. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campos JL, Charlesworth B, Haddrill PR. Molecular evolution in nonrecombining regions of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4:278–288. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types