Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;4(1):e2012075.
doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2012.075. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for aggressive lymphomas

Affiliations

Autologous stem cell transplantation for aggressive lymphomas

Giuseppe Visani et al. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2012.

Abstract

The role of high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the treatment armamentarium of aggressive B- and T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is still a matter of debate. In the pre-Rituximab era, the PARMA study demonstrated the superiority of HDT/ASCT over conventional salvage chemotherapy in chemosensitive, relapsed patients. Subsequently, HDT/ASCT has become a standard approach for relapsed NHL. With the advent of Rituximab in the landscape of NHL, transplantation as part of first-line therapy has been challenged. However, no benefit in terms of disease-free or overall survival of HDT/ASCT over standard therapy was shown when Rituximab was added to both arms. Moreover, the superiority of HDT/ASCT over conventional salvage therapy in patients relapsing from first-line therapy including Rituximab was not confirmed. From these disappointing results, novel strategies, which can enhance the anti-lymphoma effect, at the same time reducing toxicity have been developed, with the aim of improving the outcome of HDT/ASCT in aggressive NHL. In T-cell lymphoma, few publications demonstrated that consolidation of complete remission with HDT/ASCT is safe and feasible. However, up to one-third of patients may never receive transplant, mostly due to progressive disease, and relapse still remains a major concern even after transplant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gianni AM, Bregni M, Siena S, et al. High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation compared with MACOP-B in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(18):1290–1297. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199705013361804. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Santini G, Salvagno L, Leoni P, et al. VACOP-B versus VACOP-B plus autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(8):2796–2802. - PubMed
    1. Gisselbrecht C, Lepage E, Molina T, et al. Shortened first-line high-dose chemotherapy for patients with poor-porgnosis aggressive lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(10):2472–2479. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.02.125. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kaiser U, Uebelacker l, Abel U, et al. Randomized study to evaluate the use of high-dose therapy as part of primary treatment for aggressive lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(22):4413–4419. - PubMed
    1. Martelli M, Gherlinzoni F, De Renzo A, et al. Early autologous stem-cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy as front-line therapy in high-risk, aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: an italian muticenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(7):1255–1262. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.117. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources