Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial
- PMID: 23206837
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61964-3
Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial
Abstract
Background: The best way to manage restenosis in patients who have previously received a drug-eluting stent is unknown. We investigated the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), and balloon angioplasty in these patients.
Methods: In this randomised, open-label trial, we enrolled patients older than 18 years with restenosis of at least 50% after implantation of any limus-eluting stent at three centres in Germany between Aug 3, 2009, and Oct 27, 2011. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1; stratified according to centre) to receive PEB, PES, or balloon angioplasty alone by means of sealed, opaque envelopes containing a computer-generated sequence. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation, but events and angiograms were assessed by individuals who were masked. The primary endpoint was diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography at 6-8 months. Primary analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00987324.
Findings: We enrolled 402 patients, of whom 137 (34%) were assigned to PEB, 131 (33%) to PES, and 134 (33%) to balloon angioplasty. Follow-up angiography at 6-8 months was available for 338 (84%) patients. PEB was non-inferior to PES in terms of diameter stenosis (38·0% [SD 21·5] vs 37·4% [21·8]; difference 0·6%, one-sided 95% CI 4·9%; p(non-inferiority)=0·007; non-inferiority margin of 7%). Findings were consistent in per-protocol analysis (p(non-inferiority)=0·011). PEB and PES were superior to balloon angioplasty alone (54·1% [25·0]; p(superiority)<0·0001 for both comparisons). Frequency of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion thrombosis did not differ between groups.
Interpretation: By obviating the need for additional stent implantation, PEB could be a useful treatment for patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent.
Funding: Deutsches Herzzentrum.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Drug-eluting balloons for restenosis after stent implantation.Lancet. 2013 Feb 9;381(9865):431-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62120-5. Epub 2012 Dec 1. Lancet. 2013. PMID: 23206833 No abstract available.
-
Treating restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 Feb;10(2):62. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2012.189. Epub 2012 Dec 18. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23247311 No abstract available.
-
[Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in coronary restenosis?].Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013 Mar;138(12):561. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1331873. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013. PMID: 23607116 German. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
