Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 4;157(11):776-84.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00005.

Estimating overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study

Affiliations

Estimating overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study

Giulia Veronesi et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer screening may detect cancer that will never become symptomatic (overdiagnosis), leading to overtreatment. Changes in size on sequential low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, expressed as volume-doubling time (VDT), may help to distinguish aggressive cancer from cases that are unlikely to become symptomatic.

Objective: To assess VDT for screening-detected lung cancer as an indicator of overdiagnosis.

Design: Retrospective estimation of the VDT of cancer detected in a prospective LDCT screening cohort.

Setting: Nonrandomized, single-center screening study involving persons at high risk for lung cancer enrolled between 2004 and 2005 who received LDCT annually for 5 years.

Patients: 175 study patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer.

Measurements: VDT was measured on LDCT and classified as fast-growing (<400 days), slow-growing (between 400 and 599 days), or indolent (≥600 days).

Results: Fifty-five cases of cancer were diagnosed at baseline, and 120 were diagnosed subsequently. Of the latter group, 19 cases (15.8%) were new (not visible on previous scans) and fast-growing (median VDT, 52 days); 101 (84.2%) were progressive, including 70 (58.3%) fast-growing and 31 (25.8%) slow-growing (15.0%) or indolent (10.8%) cases. Lung cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher (9.2% per year) in patients with new compared with slow-growing or indolent (0.9% per year) cancer. Sixty percent of fast-growing progressive cancer and 45% of new cancer were stage I, for which survival was good.

Limitations: This is a retrospective study. Volume-doubling time can only indicate overdiagnosis and was estimated for new cancer from 1 measurement (a diameter of 2 mm assumed the previous year).

Conclusion: Slow-growing or indolent cancer comprised approximately 25% of incident cases, many of which may have been overdiagnosed. To limit overtreatment in these cases, minimally invasive limited resection and nonsurgical treatments should be investigated.

Primary funding source: Italian Association for Cancer Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Estimating overdiagnosis of lung cancer.
    Young RP, Hopkins RJ. Young RP, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):635. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00013. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23588755 No abstract available.
  • Estimating overdiagnosis of lung cancer--reply.
    Maisonneuve P, Veronesi G, Bertolotti R. Maisonneuve P, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):635-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00014. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23588756 No abstract available.

Publication types