Estimating overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study
- PMID: 23208167
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-11-201212040-00005
Estimating overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study
Abstract
Background: Lung cancer screening may detect cancer that will never become symptomatic (overdiagnosis), leading to overtreatment. Changes in size on sequential low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, expressed as volume-doubling time (VDT), may help to distinguish aggressive cancer from cases that are unlikely to become symptomatic.
Objective: To assess VDT for screening-detected lung cancer as an indicator of overdiagnosis.
Design: Retrospective estimation of the VDT of cancer detected in a prospective LDCT screening cohort.
Setting: Nonrandomized, single-center screening study involving persons at high risk for lung cancer enrolled between 2004 and 2005 who received LDCT annually for 5 years.
Patients: 175 study patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer.
Measurements: VDT was measured on LDCT and classified as fast-growing (<400 days), slow-growing (between 400 and 599 days), or indolent (≥600 days).
Results: Fifty-five cases of cancer were diagnosed at baseline, and 120 were diagnosed subsequently. Of the latter group, 19 cases (15.8%) were new (not visible on previous scans) and fast-growing (median VDT, 52 days); 101 (84.2%) were progressive, including 70 (58.3%) fast-growing and 31 (25.8%) slow-growing (15.0%) or indolent (10.8%) cases. Lung cancer-specific mortality was significantly higher (9.2% per year) in patients with new compared with slow-growing or indolent (0.9% per year) cancer. Sixty percent of fast-growing progressive cancer and 45% of new cancer were stage I, for which survival was good.
Limitations: This is a retrospective study. Volume-doubling time can only indicate overdiagnosis and was estimated for new cancer from 1 measurement (a diameter of 2 mm assumed the previous year).
Conclusion: Slow-growing or indolent cancer comprised approximately 25% of incident cases, many of which may have been overdiagnosed. To limit overtreatment in these cases, minimally invasive limited resection and nonsurgical treatments should be investigated.
Primary funding source: Italian Association for Cancer Research.
Comment in
-
Estimating overdiagnosis of lung cancer.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):635. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00013. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23588755 No abstract available.
-
Estimating overdiagnosis of lung cancer--reply.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16;158(8):635-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00014. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23588756 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical