Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jan 19;368(1610):20120080.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0080.

Evolutionary rescue and the limits of adaptation

Affiliations
Review

Evolutionary rescue and the limits of adaptation

Graham Bell. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Populations subject to severe stress may be rescued by natural selection, but its operation is restricted by ecological and genetic constraints. The cost of natural selection expresses the limited capacity of a population to sustain the load of mortality or sterility required for effective selection. Genostasis expresses the lack of variation that prevents many populations from adapting to stress. While the role of relative fitness in adaptation is well understood, evolutionary rescue emphasizes the need to recognize explicitly the importance of absolute fitness. Permanent adaptation requires a range of genetic variation in absolute fitness that is broad enough to provide a few extreme types capable of sustained growth under a stress that would cause extinction if they were not present. This principle implies that population size is an important determinant of rescue. The overall number of individuals exposed to selection will be greater when the population declines gradually under a constant stress, or is progressively challenged by gradually increasing stress. In gradually deteriorating environments, survival at lethal stress may be procured by prior adaptation to sublethal stress through genetic correlation. Neither the standing genetic variation of small populations nor the mutation supply of large populations, however, may be sufficient to provide evolutionary rescue for most populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Endler JA. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
    1. Kingsolver JG, et al. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157, 245–26110.1086/319193 (doi:10.1086/319193) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hendry AP. 2005. The power of natural selection. Nature 433, 694–69510.1038/433694a (doi:10.1038/433694a) - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carroll SP, Hendry AP, Reznick DN, Fox CW. 2007. Evolution on ecological time-scales. Funct. Ecol. 21, 387–39310.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01289.x (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01289.x) - DOI - DOI
    1. Bradshaw AD. 1984. The importance of evolutionary ideas in ecology – and vice versa. In Evolutionary ecology (ed. Shorrocks B.), pp. 1–25 Oxford, UK: Blackwell

Publication types