Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;62(604):e757-64.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X658287.

Neurolinguistic programming: a systematic review of the effects on health outcomes

Jackie Sturt  1 , Saima Ali, Wendy Robertson, David Metcalfe, Amy Grove, Claire Bourne, Chris Bridle
Affiliations

Neurolinguistic programming: a systematic review of the effects on health outcomes

Jackie Sturt et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Neurolinguistic programming (NLP) in health care has captured the interest of doctors, healthcare professionals, and managers.

Aim: To evaluate the effects of NLP on health-related outcomes.

Design and setting: Systematic review of experimental studies.

Method: The following data sources were searched: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, AMED, CINAHL, Web of Knowledge, CENTRAL, NLP specialist databases, reference lists, review articles, and NLP professional associations, training providers, and research groups.

Results: Searches revealed 1459 titles from which 10 experimental studies were included. Five studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and five were pre-post studies. Targeted health conditions were anxiety disorders, weight maintenance, morning sickness, substance misuse, and claustrophobia during MRI scanning. NLP interventions were mainly delivered across 4-20 sessions although three were single session. Eighteen outcomes were reported and the RCT sample sizes ranged from 22 to 106. Four RCTs reported no significant between group differences with the fifth finding in favour of the NLP arm (F = 8.114, P<0.001). Three RCTs and five pre-post studies reported within group improvements. Risk of bias across all studies was high or uncertain.

Conclusion: There is little evidence that NLP interventions improve health-related outcomes. This conclusion reflects the limited quantity and quality of NLP research, rather than robust evidence of no effect. There is currently insufficient evidence to support the allocation of NHS resources to NLP activities outside of research purposes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of identified studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Grindler J, Bandler R. The structure of magic: a book about language and therapy. Oxford: Science and Behaviour; 1979.
    1. Bandler R, Grinder J. Frogs into princes. Moab, UT: Real People Press; 1979.
    1. The Association for NLP. Accreditation panel. http://www.anlp.org/accreditation-panel (accessed 8 Oct 2012)
    1. International NLP Trainers Association. Standards. http://www.inlpta.org/index.php/en/standards-mainmenu-77 (accessed 8 Oct 2012)
    1. Camana R. Depression: can NLP relieve the sypmptoms of depression? Articlesantch.com http://www.articlesnatch.com/Article/Depression---Can-Nlp-Relieve-The-Sy... (accessed 3 Aug 2012)

Publication types

MeSH terms