Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Mar;7(1):1-19.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0249-3. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

Development of a comprehensive health-related needs assessment for adult survivors of childhood cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Development of a comprehensive health-related needs assessment for adult survivors of childhood cancer

Cheryl L Cox et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Examine the construct validity, stability, internal consistency, and item-response performance of a self-report health needs assessment for adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Methods: A 190-item mailed survey was completed by 1,178 randomly selected (stratified on age, diagnosis, time since diagnosis) Childhood Cancer Survivor Study participants (mean age, 39.66 [SD 7.71] years; time since diagnosis, 31.60 [SD 4.71] years). Minorities and rural residents were oversampled at a 2:1 ratio.

Results: The final instrument included 135 items comprising nine unidimensional subscales (Psycho-emotional, Health System Concerns, Cancer-Related Health Information, General Health, Survivor Care and Support, Surveillance, Coping, Fiscal Concerns, and Relationships). Confirmatory factor analysis (n = 1,178; RMSEA = 0.020; 90 % CI = 0.019-0.020; CFI = 0.956; TLI = 0.955) and person-item fit variable maps established construct validity. Across subscales, Cronbach's alpha was 0.94-0.97, and the 4-week test-retest correlations were 0.52-0.91. In a Rasch analysis, item reliability was 0.97-0.99, person reliability was 0.80-0.90, and separation index scores were 2.00-3.01. Significant subscale covariates of higher need levels included demographics, diagnosis, and treatment exposures.

Conclusions: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study Needs Assessment Questionnaire (CCSS-NAQ) is reliable and construct-valid, has strong item-response properties, and discriminates need levels.

Implications for cancer survivors: The CCSS-NAQ potentially can be used to: (1) directly assess adult childhood cancer survivors' self-reported health-related needs, (2) identify individuals or subgroups with higher-level needs, (3) inform prevention and direct intervention strategies, and (4) facilitate prioritization of health-care resource allocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIG. 1
FIG. 1
Flow chart of the study sample

References

    1. Hewitt M, Weiner SL, Simone JV. Childhood Cancer Survivorship: improving care and quality of life. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003. - PubMed
    1. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Mariotto A, Miller BA, Feuer EJ, et al. SEER cancer statistics review 1975–2004. Vol. 2007. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2007. [Accessed 24 Sept 2012]. based on November 2006 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER Web site. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/
    1. Mertens AC, Liu Q, Neglia JP, Wasilewski K, Leisenring W, Armstrong GT, et al. Cause-specific late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1368–79. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA, Kawashima T, Hudson MM, Meadows AT, et al. Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1572–82. - PubMed
    1. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. Committee on Cancer Survivorship: Improving care and quality of life: Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2005. pp. 187–321.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources