Gel-based and gel-free quantitative proteomics approaches at a glance
- PMID: 23213324
- PMCID: PMC3508552
- DOI: 10.1155/2012/494572
Gel-based and gel-free quantitative proteomics approaches at a glance
Abstract
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) is widely applied and remains the method of choice in proteomics; however, pervasive 2-DE-related concerns undermine its prospects as a dominant separation technique in proteome research. Consequently, the state-of-the-art shotgun techniques are slowly taking over and utilising the rapid expansion and advancement of mass spectrometry (MS) to provide a new toolbox of gel-free quantitative techniques. When coupled to MS, the shotgun proteomic pipeline can fuel new routes in sensitive and high-throughput profiling of proteins, leading to a high accuracy in quantification. Although label-based approaches, either chemical or metabolic, gained popularity in quantitative proteomics because of the multiplexing capacity, these approaches are not without drawbacks. The burgeoning label-free methods are tag independent and suitable for all kinds of samples. The challenges in quantitative proteomics are more prominent in plants due to difficulties in protein extraction, some protein abundance in green tissue, and the absence of well-annotated and completed genome sequences. The goal of this perspective assay is to present the balance between the strengths and weaknesses of the available gel-based and -free methods and their application to plants. The latest trends in peptide fractionation amenable to MS analysis are as well discussed.
References
-
- Fields S. Proteomics: proteomics in genomeland. Science. 2001;291(5507):1221–1224. - PubMed
-
- Wilkins MR, Sanchez JC, Gooley AA, et al. Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews. 1996;13:19–50. - PubMed
-
- Schulze WX, Usadel B. Quantitation in mass-spectrometry-based proteomics. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2010;61:491–516. - PubMed
-
- Kleparnik K, Bocek P. Electrophoresis today and tomorrow: helping biologists’ dreams come true. BioEssays. 2010;32(3):218–226. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources