Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 15;1(11):1141-5.
doi: 10.1242/bio.20122436. Epub 2012 Sep 7.

Applicability of the doubly labelled water method to the rhinoceros auklet, Cerorhinca monocerata

Masaki Shirai  1 , Motohiro Ito, Ken Yoda, Yasuaki Niizuma
Affiliations

Applicability of the doubly labelled water method to the rhinoceros auklet, Cerorhinca monocerata

Masaki Shirai et al. Biol Open. .

Abstract

The doubly labelled water (DLW) method is an isotope-based technique that is used to measure the metabolic rates of free-living animals. We validated the DLW method for measuring metabolic rates in five rhinoceros auklets (Cerorhinca monocerata) compared with simultaneous measurements using the respirometric method. We calculated the CO(2) production rate of four auklets (mean initial body mass: 552 g±36 s.d.) injected with DLW, using the one- and two-pool models. The metabolic rate during the 24-h measurements in a respirometric chamber for resting auklets averaged 16.30±1.66 kJ h(-1) (n = 4). The metabolic rates determined using the one- and two-pool models in the DLW method for the same period as the respirometric measurement averaged 16.61±2.13 kJ h(-1) (n = 4) and 16.16±2.10 kJ h(-1) (n = 4), respectively. The mean absolute percent error between the DLW and respirometric methods was 8.04% using the one-pool model and was slightly better than that with the two-pool model. The differences in value between the DLW and respirometric methods are probably due to oxygen isotope turnover, which eliminated only 10-14% of the initial enrichment excess.

Keywords: Doubly labelled water method; Respirometric method; Rhinoceros auklet; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams N. J., Brown C. R., Nagy K. A. (1986). Energy expenditure of free-ranging Wandering Albatrosses Diomedea exulans. Physiol. Zool. 59, 583–591.
    1. Bevan R., Speakman J. R., Butler P. J. (1995). Daily energy expenditure of tufted ducks - a comparison between indirect calorimetry, doubly labelled water and heart rate. Funct. Ecol. 9, 40–47 10.2307/2390088 - DOI
    1. Birt–Friesen V. L., Montevecchi W. A., Cairns D. K., Macko S. A. (1989). Activity-specific metabolic rates of free-living Northern Gannets and other seabirds. Ecology 70, 357–367 10.2307/1937540 - DOI
    1. Butler P. J., Green J. A., Boyd I. L., Speakman J. R. (2004). Measuring metabolic rate in the field: the pros and cons of the doubly labelled water and heart rate methods. Funct. Ecol. 18, 168–183 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00821.x - DOI
    1. Culebras J. M., Moore F. D. (1977). Total body water and the exchangeable hydrogen. I. Theoretical calculation of nonaqueous exchangeable hydrogen in man. Am. J. Physiol. 232, R54–R59. - PubMed