Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:291235.
doi: 10.5402/2012/291235. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

Navigating the difficult robotic assisted pyeloplasty

Affiliations

Navigating the difficult robotic assisted pyeloplasty

David D Thiel. ISRN Urol. 2012.

Abstract

Pyeloplasty is the gold standard therapy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Robotic assisted pyeloplasty has been widely adopted by urologists with and without prior laparoscopic pyeloplasty experience. However, difficult situations encountered during robotic assisted pyeloplasty can significantly add to the difficulty of the operation. This paper provides tips for patient positioning, port placement, robot docking, and intraoperative dissection and repair in patients with the difficult situations of obesity, large floppy liver, difficult to reflect colon (transmesenteric pyeloplasty), crossing vessels, large calculi, and previous attempts at ureteropelvic junction repair. Techniques presented in this paper may aid in the successful completion of robotic assisted pyeloplasty in the face of the difficult situations noted above.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standard port placement for RAP. 8 mm robotic ports are placed in the upper and lower quadrant midclavicular lines. The 12 mm camera port is placed near the umbilicus. A 12 mm assistant port is placed in the suprapubic midline (circle). In right-sided cases, a midaxillary 5 mm port (arrow) may be needed for liver retraction. In obese patients, the assistant port may need to be moved to the subxiphoid region (square) or the midline (triangle) (assuming that the robotic ports have been moved laterally). (Figure adapted from [5] with permissions from the puplisher).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Robot docking for RAP. The patient's legs are shifted toward the operating surgeon, and the robot is brought in perpendicular to the room. This creates a 60 degree angle with the patient's spine and helps instrument mobility in the upper quadrants. (Figure adapted from [5] with permissions from the publisher.)

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Pediatric robotic urologic surgery-2014.
    Kearns JT, Gundeti MS. Kearns JT, et al. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2014 Jul;19(3):123-8. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.136456. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2014. PMID: 25197187 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Mufarrij PW, Woods M, Shah OD, et al. Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. Journal of Urology. 2008;180(4):1391–1396. - PubMed
    1. Gupta NP, Nayyar R, Hemal AK, Mukherjee S, Kumar R, Dogra PN. Outcome analysis of robotic pyeloplasty: a large single-centre experience. BJU International. 2010;105(7):980–983. - PubMed
    1. Singh I, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome. The Canadian journal of urology. 2010;17(2):5099–5108. - PubMed
    1. Thiel DD, Winfield HN. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica. 2007;59(2):167–177. - PubMed
    1. Thiel DD, Leroy JL, Winfield HN, Igel TC. Roboticassisted laparoscopic reconstruction of the upper urinary tract: tips and tricks. Urology. 2010;76(2):488–493. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources